-
Posts
2,401 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
121
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Articles
Posts posted by Sword
-
-
What people can ask for and what you are prepared to pay are two entirely separate issues. You can control the later and not the former. I personally don't worry about things like that.
-
I rather like the Princess Anne portrait myself. It's quite a good likeness and she is 75 years young after all. Here is a photo of her taken this year.
-
Try balancing the coin on your forefinger and then tap with another coin to hear how it sounds. Silver sounds very differently than base metal.
-
On 10/3/2025 at 3:33 PM, Citizen H said:
Victoria Half Crown, 1898, it was very mucky covered in crud, It was left in soapy water...over night... as I forgot it was there, very impressed by it condition its turned out to be, just goes to show that gentle cleaning does pay off.....
If the coin is not high grade and is very dirty, then cleaning it is OK. But you need to be very careful with high grade examples. For high grades, dabbing with a cotton bud soaked in acetone should be fine, but don't rub, as this will cause hairlines.
-
1
-
-
The smallest "coin" is just 1.9mm. But I am not sure modern gimmicks count.
-
1
-
-
The issue next to the ear looks like a flan lamination flaw: a layer on the surface on the coin has flaked off.
-
1
-
-
Note the broken B in "BRITT". This is due to a broken punch or blocked die and is not a true error. However, some people would call it the RRITT error and they really shouldn't. You can make out the letters WWP next to HONI on the reverse. WWP are the initials of the master of the mint, William Wesley Pole. There is the letter W by the letter N of PENSE for Thomas Wyon the Younger, the chief engraver.
I don't have a 1817 shilling, but have brought a nice sixpence of the same design some time ago.
-
1
-
-
On 8/30/2025 at 5:19 PM, Citizen H said:
8 Reales 1852, MEXICO there has been a recent chat about Counter stamps and chop marks.....I didn't realise I had one!?!??! 😕
(These coins, made of 90.3% silver, not only consolidated the post-independence Mexican economy but also circulated in markets as far away as China and the Philippines.)
Some of those chop marks are definitely Chinese characters. These circulated widely in China alongside other foreign silver dollars. 8 Reales is still on my list of things to get. Great history!
2 hours ago, Peckris 2 said:I think the silver content and weight will check out as good? From what I can gather, this particular coin is rather like the Maria Theresa thaler which is still minted - not for any fraudulent reason, but because it's both a very desirable coin in its own right, but also because it's still used in some places!
I wasn't aware of that. I think the original ones are still very affordable if one is not gunning for a top grade example.
-
11 hours ago, Citizen H said:
..... admittedly I do sympathetically wash the grubby ones over removing the hand grime and god only knows what else they have been covered in...
I don't think there is any problem with washing really dirty low grade coins gently if necessary.
-
1
-
-
I don't think the colour is "artificial". I think that perhaps someone has tried to clean it in the past (look in particular to the area in front of the horse). The tarnish is more easily removed from the worn areas of the coin and hence the appearance after "cleaning".
-
1
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, Kipster said:
"a young, enthusiastic person with a genuine interest in coins that would be excited about the job enough to stay for that kind of money"
R7 rarity for someone good?
-
1
-
-
Low eye appeal but high grade hammered in slabs is not such a bad thing. Let investors buy these and leaving the well struck VF for collectors 😀.
-
1
-
1
-
-
This coin highlights that the criteria for grading milled coins are not sufficient (or appropriate) for "grading" hammered coins.
One can assume that milled coins generally have decent round full weight flans and much less weakness or flat areas. Then one can concentrate on assessing the wear as it is the dominant factor in grading milled. Lustre + hairlines, etc are other complementary factors.
But for hammered, the wear is not the single dominant factor and is often not even the most important factor. The grading done by TPG on hammered coins often seem to ignore flat areas (can be much more important than wear) and shape of flan. Hence, I find grading numbers rather meaningless for hammered.
-
3
-
-
Good! I seen your eBay listing and the photos you have there show off the lustre much better.
-
I love the designs of thalers. The quality of striking is often so much better than the English crowns of the same age. I like your 1604 Saxony thaler!
-
2
-
-
Didn't you say it's a keeper just 2 hours ago?
-
1
-
-
I would say it is around EF. (The coin looks dull but that could be due to photograph). If there is some lustre on the surfaces, perhaps worth about £35 or £40.
-
1
-
-
-
-
Subject to funds, I would suggest you upgrade to UNC and take your time. Looking at a coin a top grade gives so much more pleasure. And there is no reason to have them all in the same grade.
-
1
-
-
Scrap value is just over £8 and so you can't complain.
-
On 4/23/2025 at 7:57 PM, Citizen H said:
Make the most of the situation. Try selling it to Martin Scorsese and see if you can make a profit.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Sword said:
GF/NVF for the George II shilling I think. The reverse is better. Good coin.
-
1
-
1
-
-
These Prices are getting out of hand
in Free for all
Posted
I brought mine for £63; 8 years ago.