Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

1949threepence

Expert Grader
  • Posts

    8,081
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    262

Everything posted by 1949threepence

  1. The indentation on the E is present on all three - my pic not being good enough to show the scratch. So it's definitely the same coin. Odds against those identical flaws being present on two coins being astronomical. But how do you expain the loss of lustre, Matt?
  2. Hmm, not sure what to make of it. The dent in the bottom stem of the "E" of "ONE", mentioned by Bernie, is present on all three pics. Richard's, Bernie's article, and mine from the Empire Co document. What I can't explain is that the first two appear to show a lustred coin, but Richard's pic shows a coin that seems to be fully toned.
  3. Thanks for that, Bernie. Very interesting reading. £24k in 1991. I bet it would fetch a lot more now, possibly even 6 figures. So Peck acquired the penny from Spinks. I wonder who they acquired it from?
  4. Given they were all supposedly melted down, apart from this one specimen, that wouldn't logically follow.
  5. There are three questions which we don't know the answer to (well somebody might, assuming they're still alive). They are:- 1) How the single 1954 coin entered circulation, or if it was removed from the Royal MInt premises, accidentally or otherwise by a Royal MInt employee. 2) If it did somehow get into circulation via a mistake at the Royal MInt, who initially found it. 3/ How did Peck get hold of it? From a legal perspective, the Royal Mint would have to assume that it accidentally entered circulation, but having done so - obviously by means unknown - ownership is then transferred to the current bearer. That's the way I would see it anyway. Any rate, the Mint have never claimed ownership.
  6. Hope this is OK, Bernie:- Just to add it's the best I can get, as the actual pic on the document itself, is not that brilliant.
  7. I received my DNW auction lots today, and in the Peck that I won, there was a very interesting document from the Empire Coin company about the probably unique 1954 penny. Take a look:-
  8. Picked up from Post Office today. Many thanks, Ian.
  9. The best way of cleaning coins is not to clean them. You can do untold damage quite unintentionally.
  10. Definite bargain there, Peter !
  11. I'll take it as it's a distinct improvement on the one I've just bought, which I'll now keep as a spare. Have sent you a PM.
  12. I'd just add that my girlfriend suffers from Rheumatoid Arthritis, and the methetrexate she needs to take all the time, plus occasional steroid course, is prescription cost exempt because her condition is chronic. But those are not especially expensive drugs. Some cancer drugs are incredibly costly, and it's a lottery as to whether the NHS here will fund drug treatment for those patients affected.
  13. Jesus Christ, Bob - $11,000 per month is off the scale. I am so sorry to hear this. Hope your wife is OK. God bless.
  14. Idiot that I am, I only went and uploaded a pic of my Freeman 28 in error. The actual Freeman 25 is here (sorry for the confusion folks)
  15. Wish I could. Unfortunately my photographic skills are not that good.
  16. It doesn't show on the pic, but under a loupe, the L C WYON is there, clear of the bust and showing as I C WYON, consistent with obverse 4. To be honest, when I first looked at it this morning, on its arrival, I thought the same as you, until I saw the signature.
  17. Managed to obtain a Freeman 25 from Dave Craddock for just £45. It's only about fine, but despite the rarity 12, you see very few of this type for sale. For example only 2 in the LCA during the last 13 years. There was a UNC in the Workman sale a few years ago though.
  18. A very pleasant guy called Dave just phoned me to say that my lots will be sent next week, all in one package (books and coins together) by Royal Mail next day delilvery. Apparently the delay was due to the books and coins being on different floors, and they're just getting round to marrying the two together.
  19. Mine still haven't arrived and the shipping info remains blank. I had this reply to an enquiry I made on Wednesday:- I think I'm going to have to get in contact again.
  20. Cheers Matt. Of course the rare pennies in the 20th century are well known, and there are fewer varieties. That said, there are some extremely expensive ones amongst them, when in prime condition. I'm thinking especially of the 1919KN and the 1926ME. If I'd had the cash at the time, I'd have gone for Steve's in advance of starting. But before all that I've got to finish the 1860 and 1861 series, as far as is practicable, as well as a few other little spaces.
  21. I started on Victorian pennies 1860 to 1901, in 2010, and am now down to the rare varieties. I know full well I'm not going to get them all. Indeed, with a few, there is only one example. So there will come a time in the not too distant future, when further additions to that collection become so infrequent, that my attention will shift to the next area I have planned, namely seriously starting with pennies from 1902 to 1967. That will probably be next year at some point.
  22. Hmmm....I know someone whose only relief from chronic pain, is from the illegal and unofficial use of cannabis. Not smoked, but ingested from cake. Prescription drugs and OTC medicines either won't touch it, or cause stomach upsets. Cannabis is the only thing which both enables him to get a decent night's sleep and not cause digestive issues. Of course, what he is doing, is illegal, but I'm not about to grass him up (no pun intended) For that reason I'd legalise it for pain relief on prescription.
  23. When I was a rookie collector, I made mistakes and forked out on some overpriced coins. But I never whined and complained about it, as though it were somebody else's fault. I simply observed, learned, did more reading, researched my field and improved my expertise. As time moved on, I even started to pick up some bargains. When building my collection, I've even taken the hit from the money spent on an earlier coin, by upgrading that specimen. It's because our interest tends to override the cost. Indeed, most coin collectors are in it for the actual coins themselves, and have no intention of actually selling them anyway. Or would only do so if they genuinely needed the money for other things.
  24. Just watched the programme on i player, and can only echo the closing words of the guy who bought all the commemoratives - "research and do your homework" - in other words "caveat emptor". Sorry, but I don't have a lot of sympathy. Nice spot by Geoff T. Agreed with all he said.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test