TomGoodheart Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Very nice! - have we got you interested enough to expand the collection then? (Or put you off for life!) Quote
Sylvester Posted July 1, 2004 Posted July 1, 2004 Er... yes. I think. Though I'm still struggling with the difference between 1565 (whihc I have a photo of ) and 1566 (which I don't). I'd go for your classification on the basis that it was more 'scientifically' derived whereas mine is just on the basis of a few pictures!!! Well i'm not looking at the book, cos i haven't the time.But i think the difference is in the lettering, one has plainer writing than the other, S.1566 has the plainer writing. But since most of it is missing (the important letters E, C and R) it's hard to tell.I think that S.1565 has a lis on the bust and S.1566 doesn't. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.