Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

If in doubt say Henry VI, firstly you say it's heavier and that important cos it means it was produced between Edward III and the first part of Edward IV's reign. Henry VI ones are quite common so lets have a look there, if not there than under Edward III equally common. If that fails then we'll look under Richard II and Henry V... If that fails then we'll get to that if we have to...

Posted

Look on the obverse side where the king's byust is, to the bottom left if you can read the legend tell me if there is a z there...

From directly below the king's bust it should read something like... ANGL then what does it read?

Posted

Oh i know it's ANGL, it's just i can't see a z or not, that is important... i think i now what it might be... well i have a chouice between a few but i need to know if there is any z there...

Actually just check this one... S.1566

After the ANGL is there what looks like a random placed 1 that looks a bit homeless?

Posted

I'm still not sure about this one though cos if you see here can you see a mintmark, this is kind of like Henry VI?

Right i've done a bit of circling... the one on the left, what letter is that?

The one on the right, what is that? (See if it looks like any mintmarks in the Spinks table)

post-32-1088628677_thumb.jpg

Posted

yeah i was looking at that... (i've just removed that post cos of Chris' bandwith it was a bit big!)

My picture with the terrible circles shows it though.

Posted

the letter to the right of it looks like an F for FRANC.

The letter before looks like the the L from ANGL...

But that sure doesn't look like a Z does it?

Posted

Looks similar to a pre-treaty groat series C (London ) in the Circular - S 1565, if that helps...

Posted

I could be a back to front F actually, and the other letter to the right an R or a D... which would fit in with the Edward III Post treaty coins, have a look at S.1637

Posted

But this has the annulet stops of the pre treaty coin whereas S1637 has cross stops whic come in during the transitional period no?

Posted

You're most probably right it's getting late and i'm getting confused. So is it in actual fact what i said it was the first time around? :unsure:

I'm having a tough time with this one! :o

Posted

Er... yes. I think. Though I'm still struggling with the difference between 1565 (whihc I have a photo of ) and 1566 (which I don't). I'd go for your classification on the basis that it was more 'scientifically' derived whereas mine is just on the basis of a few pictures!!!

Posted

Oh .. and well done!!!

Posted

I hope we haven't scared Big Bear off!

Posted

Sorry - just a bit carried away! So is the rest early hammered too? ( ie no Charles I, my particular interest!!)

(Looks like a nice collection by the way!)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test