kuhli Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Chris,I doubt anyone (other than me!) would even notice this error, but on pg 85, under the decimal coinage section, for the pennies, you have 1984 listed as FROM SETS ONLY, which is not correct. It was a regular circulation piece, with a mintage of 154,759,625 (from the 1999 CCGB!). The penny, 20p and £1 were the only circulation pieces minted that year. The rest of the denominations are indeed from sets only. Quote
Sylvester Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Chris,I doubt anyone (other than me!) would even notice this error, but on pg 85, under the decimal coinage section, for the pennies, you have 1984 listed as FROM SETS ONLY, which is not correct. It was a regular circulation piece, with a mintage of 154,759,625 (from the 1999 CCGB!). The penny, 20p and £1 were the only circulation pieces minted that year. The rest of the denominations are indeed from sets only. Correct. I never looked in that section of the book. But since i dabble in decimal coins upto and including 1984 i know this to be true. Quote
Chris Perkins Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Thanks, in fact, lets put all the errors notifications in this one place. Can someone paste the URL's of the other forum areas reporting other areas? I'll get confused unless they're all in one place. Quote
Geordie582 Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 (edited) If you correct the spine error on Collectors Coins GB (Great Brittain) will that make my copy a collectors item?? Edited May 11, 2005 by Geordie582 Quote
Chris Perkins Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 No, because if I do need to print more the rarer ones will be the correct spine ones! Quote
kuhli Posted May 11, 2005 Author Posted May 11, 2005 Guesstimate?? or Guestimate??guesstimatep12 1915p27 1952guestimatep18 1937p26 1937p27 1954 Quote
kuhli Posted May 11, 2005 Author Posted May 11, 2005 Page 6introduction to fractional farthings. paragraph ends " For a range of farthings that is second to none" should there be something else there?? just doesn't look right. maybe the last line of the paragraph got removed?? Quote
Chris Perkins Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Ok, great, keep it all here.I didn't get it proofread because it took longer than I expected and time was so short! The next one will have 0 errors! Quote
Sylvester Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Ok, great, keep it all here.I didn't get it proofread because it took longer than I expected and time was so short! The next one will have 0 errors! Always give yourself a little room for manoeuvre Chris... cos if you don't one will always get past you. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.