Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

out detecting last night and this beautiful late neolithic/early bronze age chisel was sat looking up at me from the surface, 

36281896_10155333114661020_9153564941255442432_o.jpg

36329548_10155333114591020_3729761067409080320_o.jpg

36333919_10155333114551020_3290504501370290176_o.jpg

  • Like 6
Posted (edited)

Nice find. Beautiful workmanship on it. Definitely a skilled knapper. I thought it was a thames pick when i first saw it but the workmanships too advanced for the mesolithic period. 

Edited by Ukstu
Typo
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ukstu said:

Nice found. Beautiful workmanship on it. Definitely a skilled knapper. I thought it was a thames pick when i first saw it but the workmanships too advanced for the mesolithic period. 

it cam from within sight of the Lower Thames

Posted
Just now, craigy said:

it cam from within sight of the Lower Thames

Cool. Perhaps people were just following on with the old style or shape. I have a partial broken thames pick but the flake patterns are nowhere as advanced as that. Mine are just singlular strikes creating large one piece flakes. I'd let your FLO look at that. 

Guest craig
Posted
7 hours ago, Ukstu said:

Cool. Perhaps people were just following on with the old style or shape. I have a partial broken thames pick but the flake patterns are nowhere as advanced as that. Mine are just singlular strikes creating large one piece flakes. I'd let your FLO look at that. 

after looking around i believe it is a mesolithic thames pick, how cool is that ;0) 

Posted (edited)

The patina is not right for a mesolithic piece. It could be a Thames pick that's been retouched as they call it. I think possibly someone else found it in the late Neo or early Bronze age and reworked it. Heres mine , you can see what I mean about tranchet flakes. The front edge and 2 side flakes where caused by one strike to the upper highlighted area. Pieces made during the mesolithic were not as well worked as yours. 

I would take it along to your FLO. It could be useful in proving how long the area has been occupied. 

2018-06-28-22-34-31.jpg

Edited by Ukstu
Posted

Try and get it looked at. I could well be wrong but either way it's still a very interesting and intriguing find regardless of age. Some FLO will identify by email so no need to send it in. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test