Peckris Posted June 29, 2017 Posted June 29, 2017 The problem with the shuv--ha'penny theory is that it's always the reverse that wears flat - obverses (Ed VII Geo V) were rarely worn that badly, and were a grade and a half better at least. The real cause of the problem was 1) the depth of the Geo V portrait and 2) the shallow reverse rims. Rims were better on pennies and farthings which didn't suffer so badly. Quote
scott Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 I have found OH viccies and Edward VII heavily worn both sides,to the extent of your average 1890's pennies Quote
hibernianscribe Posted July 11, 2017 Posted July 11, 2017 On 23/06/2017 at 11:41 PM, Stuntman said: Wow, an 1820 shilling received in change! That must have been very exciting to someone with an interest in coins. The coin clearly found an appropriate custodian. It was indeed a real thrill when I spotted it in my hand. As I said before though, because the sizes of our silver coinage were the same for many, many years, the chances of this happening were greater. Wouldn't happen today! Quote
mick1271 Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Not a coin , but got a nice condition clydesdale bank fiver from 1996 in my change last month .They have been withdrawn from circulation for a good while , but I happily pocketed it . Obviously not been circulating for 21 years . Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.