VickySilver Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 (edited) I just had a look at the upcoming Goldberg's catalogue, and was quite disappointed by the overall offerings, but more than this really have to question the three "VIP Record Proof" Wreaths dated 1928, 1932, and 1936. The latter looks perhaps the best, but the obverse of KG5 is very poorly struck in all three, the rims/edges just not there for proofs, and the reverse wreath details (i.e. stamens and flower details esp.) quite poor, at least to the accepted proofs that I have seen. I vote against all three, what say you dear readers? You may want to look at the Proof 65 1927 just prior in this auction or the 1936 I had posted [with help] earlier on these boards. Edited May 8, 2017 by VickySilver Quote
Leo Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 Yes, I just looked at them. They are knackered too - but maybe that's why they are PR62 rather than PR65. Definitely not VIP You mean for instance the thistle details being poor? Quote
VickySilver Posted May 12, 2017 Author Posted May 12, 2017 Yes, and the centers of the flowers (stamen). The details in G5's hair just is not there on any of the three and as you say they've been knocked about. If you compare them to the 1936 I posted up here, you may see the differences. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.