Coindome
Members-
Posts
32 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Articles
Everything posted by Coindome
-
Hi, Does anyone know what dealers are currently paying for 1920-1946 silver coinage? Thanks
-
London Mint Office
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
It's a hard one to explain... especially at a time when precious metals are in demand, "your lovely set of gold coins aren't worth anything" -
London Mint Office
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
I guessed this was the case. How come it isn't more in the public eye / public awareness ? -
Hi I've been offered a set of Gold Coins originally sold in limited numbers (just 499) by the London Mint Office. The set is no longer wanted by the current owner. I recognise there is a difference between the Royal Mint and the London Mint Office but can anyone give me an idea of desirability being they're not Royal Mint. It's the decimalisation anniversary set issued at £396 I think. http://www.londonmintoffice.org/an-exclusive-opportunity-to-celebrate-the-most-significant-event-in-coinage-history/ Any thoughts, comments would be appreciated, Thanks
-
Can anyone read Japan coin dates ?
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Excellent. Thank you -
Hi This is a decent size coin, 36mm and I'd say slightly thicker than our old copper penny. Strangely, the detail simply looks like it isn't struck up rather than being worn away. Any thoughts on that? Again, it must be Asia somewhere but I haven't got a clue otherwise. Does anyone specialise in this area ? Cheers
-
Coin identification help please ?
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Thanks Brian. That's really helpful. Coin 2 starts in a new thread.... -
Confused by Spink descriptions !
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
I think S3609 is correct and makes sense. The photo is correct (2nd bust). Surely E* must be "below bust"... where else would it be ?!!! I understand "local dies" to be where the curls both turn to the right, as per the photo in S3615. Frankly, I'm suspicious this is an error in Spink and that in fact S3609A doesn't exist or has been superceded by S3615 Can anyone prove otherwise ? -
I'm currently looking at my 2010 45th edition of Spink which is a couple of years old. In particular I'm trying to attribute Anne 1708 Shillings with the local Edinburgh bust (the two curls at the top of the bust both turn to the right). I'm confused with the descriptions between S3609A and S3615. Since S3608 refers to 2nd Bust... S3609 (similar) is also 2nd Bust with E*. What therefore is S3609A (( 2nd Bust I assume because it states "Similar" )) Local dies ? S3615 makes more sense because it doesn't refer to a previous coin as being "similar". Do you see what I mean ? There are pictures of S3615 & S3609 which are correct but I can't understand what S3609A refers to. Does anyone have a more recent Spink? Has this changed or am I misunderstanding the comments ? HELP !! ...please. Thanks
-
Old Editions of Spink & Seaby
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Just a bit confused here.... can you tell me what edition the 1980 figures come from? I have 1972 being edition 12 and I have 1989 being edition 24. It appears there weren't publications every year. Cheers -
Old Editions of Spink & Seaby
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Thanks everyone..... but keep going !!! Has anyone got early copies of "Standard Catalogue of British Coins" ? I've got a copy of 1968 and starting to believe it might be worth something !!!! Does anyone know, can I post a spreadsheet to demonstrate the figures I've collected and those I'm still looking for ? Cheers -
Old Editions of Spink & Seaby
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Thanks everyone. That is all a lot of good information. I'm now missing 2001, 2002 and most of the 60's and 70's. It would be good if I could just get a few of the very older ones. I think they started in 1962 I'll probably ask the question again in a few days to see if I can jog anyone with older copies. Cheers -
Old Editions of Spink & Seaby
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
I guess that 2007 EF £1100 should be Unc and the EF is missing ? Can you confirm please ? There's no hurry but if the missing years were available it would be really good. Thanks. The reason I'm doing this is only out of interest. I've got a receipt for £107 10s in 1965 paid by a bank to purchase this coin from Seaby. When you look back at the price of gold it becomes interesting how the collector aspect has taken over from the gold value -
Hi I was wondering if anyone could help me collate a specific coin price in past editions of Spink (previously Seaby) ? The coin is the 1887 gold Five Pound in grades F, VF, EF, Unc and Proof. I've got the following years but if anyone has any missing years, it would be great if they could fill in the gaps. 1968 7th edition 1990 25th edition 2000 35th edition F £400, VF £500, EF £600, Unc £750, Proof £2250. 2003 38th edition 2005 40th edition 2006 41st edition 2008 43rd edition 2010 45th edition All help will be hugely appreciated, Thanks
-
Is there anywhere I can look up up-to-date prices for ordinary GVF+ Sovereigns? Say for different reigns too..... Liz 1960's, George V, Ed VII & Victoria. No varieties, just normal boring common examples. Thanks
-
Identify this token please ?
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
hmmmm, I see what you're getting at but it still looks like it could be a 'B'. If anyone could find more info it would be great..... -
Identify this token please ?
Coindome posted a topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Hi, Can anyone help identify this coin / token please? It's very light weight, flakey thin and brassy. On one side is a tree and the other appears to be a house. This is a guess but the lettering appears to be.... DIBEH?E GO I.C.?.?.?.P. Any help would be great.... Cheers -
William III Shilling collectors
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Brilliant. This is all interesting stuff. Is anyone aware of any studies, publications or focus on this issue? Cheers -
William III Shilling collectors
Coindome replied to Coindome's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Hi, Yes, I understand the point you make. The point I was making is that the Spink values indicate a rarity or perhaps imply a rarity. The rarer the coin the more expensive. Look at 1697 3rd bust. The Spink price for the 'y' is cheapest of all 1697 3rd busts whereas ESC rarity states 'C' should be more common. See what I mean? or perhaps Spink feel a lot of 'y' have come to market whereas 'C' haven't !! Cheers -
I was wondering if there were any keen Shilling collectors for the 1696 & 1697 regions (B,C,E,N,Y,y) out there? I'm interested to compare what anyone considers are the relative rarities of these coins. Ignoring all the specific varieties, (no stops, overstrikes etc), these coins recorded for both Spink and ESC don't seem to agree. (surprise, surprise). For example, looking at 1696 1st bust only, Spink indicates 1696B is the commonest and 1696N is rarest. ESC rate them all as Scarce apart from 1696B and 1696Y which are Rare. Personally I find the Exeter occuring most frequesntly and the Y hardest. Has anyone got any thoughts on relative rarities of these coins. I know there are several varieties too which are unrecorded (or recorded glibly) but any thoughts or ideas would be appreciated. Cheers