Well that's the reason i'm not too keen on it, it's just too plain for my liking (the big gold coins in matt proof are something to behold indeed!), but i prefer coins with extremely intricate detail in as higher relief as is realistically possible. For me there is nothing better than a high grade hammered gold sovereign of Henry VII or Queen Mary, detailed tressels and arches, a grandness in the monarch enthroned, a stunning rose on the reverse. The power the majesty and the glory of a new dynasty and a break away from the medieval past. Plus hardly a blank space in sight, some might class it as cluttered, but i don't like plain fields on coins anyhow cos i think it's a waste, (hence why i like shield reverse sovereigns there's hardly any blank space on the reverse), also the reverses of the bare head Geo IV stuff, the ornamentally garnished shield is fantastic... that reverse is my kinda coin, now if that was with a very detailed obverse a la George II i'd be very happy! I think that's another reason why sixpences appeal to me more than the crowns, sixpences have less unused blank field! Also why Early milled appeals more to me, it a relief thing. Incuse coins are my worst nightmare!