Oxford_Collector Posted January 13, 2007 Posted January 13, 2007 Aidan, You are correct that Krause does list restrikes for 1918I. Please note the restrikes are listedas proof-like. This probably indicates to me small numbers were minted for numismatic purposes.Is there any other way to distinguish the pieces other than proof-like? The 1925 British pieceswere struck with a different collar so the edge graining is different and you can tell therestrikes from the original. But even so, who cares about the difference.Two more books I have found to help with gaining knowledge about sovereigna are:The History Of The Gold Sovereign Sir Geoffrey Duveen and H. G. StrideRoyal Sovereign 1489-1989 Edited By G. P. Dyer Librarian and Curator, Royal MintI have a 1918 Bombay sovereign, on my scales it weighs in at 8.01g. I would grade it as Good Extra Fine. I bought it for £88 in an eBay auction last autumn. Definitely doesn't look like a fake, I've no idea how to tell if its a restrike or not.BTW as far as I'm aware, whilst not common, its not that rare a sovereign - see: http://www.andyscouse.com/coins/sovereign_gv.htm and http://allgoldcoins.co.uk/allgold/informat...eign_rarity.htm, certainly more common than the Canadian sovereigns, and I've seen them in eBay (albeit not in as good a grade).Paul Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.