Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

ohb1

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

ohb1's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks Peckris, Once you explained the "I" being an "x", I could see the difference when I compared it to the "I" in "Victoria".. ..it makes such a difference when "someone in the know" points someone like me in the right direction Ohb1
  2. Thanks so much Peckris and Garrett..it makes it so obvious when you change the I to an X...Being somewhat ignorant of older English coins, It did have me baffled..again thanks ohb1
  3. oops..forgot to include the photo...
  4. Hi all, I am new to this forum, so please bear with me if I have posted this query in the wrong section. I live in Australia, and metal detect for pre decimal (silver) coins that were the common form of currency pre 1966. My friend and I are compiling a complete set of Australian silvers from metal detecting finds, but my friend is keeping a separate collection of English silvers that we have found. This past month, my friend found a gothic florin..the first one she has found in Australia, and only the second she has found in her past 25 years of detecting. So here is my question. Can someone please comment on the following abnormalities (1)..The "Britt" (double T) suggests the coin is dated after 1868, but the roman numerals suggest 1853 (2) what is the seemingly additional letter after the date ? It has been suggested that the coin is a contemporary copy or fake..but if this is the case, why the obvious addition of an extra letter ( as in (2) above), and if it is a forgery, why make an obvious "error" (as in (1)) I have yet to weigh it to see if it comes close to the official weight of around 11 grams. Any and all comments will be much appreciated Ohb1
×
×
  • Create New...
Test