That's very much the view I'm coming too. I also agree that the coin in my original post is almost certainly genuine now I've learned a bit about fake quids. Speaking of which, I've managed to get a few more photos done. All are available at high resolution so you can have a close look. 2 x fake 2005 £1 coins :
obverse + reverse (coin in the middle is genuine circulated one for comparison)
edge fake 1993 £1 coin :
obverse + reverse, (fake is on the right, genuine circulated one on the left)
edge (fake is on top, genuine circulated bottom) I'd also be interested in anyone's thoughts on this 2003 pound coin :
obverse + reverse (suspected fake on right, genuine uncirculated on left)
edge (suspected fake on top, genuine uncirculated on bottom) The weight, diameter, width and die alignment are all good and there's nothing on the reverse + obverse that would give you reason to think it fake, but it looks to me like there are significant enough differences in the character and spacing of the edge inscription (esp. between the N of TUTAMEN, the cross and the D of DECUS) that this must be counterfeit? If it is fake then it's one of the most convincing I've seen. You need to look at the full resolution image to really see what I'm talking about.