Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sword

Are untoned proof silver coins more desirable than toned?

Recommended Posts

I noticed that in the last LCA, a 1935 raised edge proof crown (described as "nFDC with some light hairlines and retaining full original mint brilliance") realised £850. This seems to a lot of money to me especially with the coin having hairlines. If this coin is toned (and so the mint lustre is less obvious), I think it will only sell for about half that amount. I know I sound very naïve for asking this question but are untoned proof coins a lot more desirable than toned?

post-7623-0-45001600-1441910455_thumb.jp

post-7623-0-33937400-1441910480_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think any coin should look its age. i.e. untampered with. I would always want a toned 200 year old coin over a dipped 'blast white' piece. There are very few reasons why old silver wouldn't tone and all involve keeping the coin in anaerobic conditions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dup

Edited by azda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if a dipped proof would retain its proof fields, i've never tried obviously, but dipping even a currency coin for longer than 10 seconds and it looses all its life and looks like stone.

Martin P from ebay does this quite often and those he's overdipped are very obvious, proofs in my opinion might lose its brilliant fields somewhat.

Anyone want to experiment? :D

Rocking horse proofs normally sell around the £450-£500+ region

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a spare 1937 proof, otherwise I would.

Someone must have a spare that is toned. A 6d or a 3d is only worth a tenner max in any case.

Edited by Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a spare 1937 proof, otherwise I would.

Oh, just try one of your others Rob :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too prefer coins to look their age and get suspicious with a blazing white 19th century proof coin.

But nevertheless, I still don't understand why that coin was sold for so much. Has someone just pay way over the top on this occasion or do blazing white proof coins with reflective fields always sell for a lot more (for right or wrong reasons)?

Just out of interest, I brought this one for £420 + juice a couple of years back. (Probably paid a little too much then and I concede the toning on the reverse is not great looking. But it has no obvious hairlines)

post-7623-0-80813800-1441914196_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It might have looked good in the hand. What you see in a picture is often a lot worse than the same thing to the eye. The minute I use a flash I find it makes everything look severely abused. Very often there is no hairlining to be seen despite what the picture says..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true and hence I never use a flash to take photos of coins. But for this particular coin, the auction description does state it has "some light hairlines"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This one was once mine

post-5057-0-34069700-1441916687_thumb.jp

post-5057-0-03582200-1441916697_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think you'd knacker the fields of a proof with even the lightest of dips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh, well, I'm guilty of having done that and worse!

Light dip will not affect the proof nature of the coin, heavier will.

Do NOT use dip on copper-nickel (don't ask). Obviously NOT copper coins either.

Not as good on .500 as .925 silver.

If one does dip, it is possible a light dip will not do more than minimally strip SOME of the toning.

5 or 10 seconds of dip will not destroy the coin but err to the latter and nearly all toning will go.

Please do rinse, wash with mild soap, and rinse liberally again with high nap cotton white towel tamp dry.

Sword, IMO, that first coin has been dipped to "full original mint brilliance"...

Edited by VickySilver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh, well, I'm guilty of having done that and worse!

Light dip will not affect the proof nature of the coin, heavier will.

Do NOT use dip on copper-nickel (don't ask). Obviously NOT copper coins either.

Not as good on .500 as .925 silver.

If one does dip, it is possible a light dip will not do more than minimally strip SOME of the toning.

5 or 10 seconds of dip will not destroy the coin but err to the latter and nearly all toning will go.

Please do rinse, wash with mild soap, and rinse liberally again with high nap cotton white towel tamp dry.

Sword, IMO, that first coin has been dipped to "full original mint brilliance"...

Many thanks for sharing your experience VS!

It is really surprising to me that some collectors would pay so much money for a coin that is likely to have been dipped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sword,

As to your original question. I just think its a matter of taste.

I have noticed that some 1911 silver proofs with blue green lustre are stunning and attract a premium.

If a coin develops toning with lustre and eye appeal why should it be cheaper than a coin with original brilliance? Of course with copper and bronze its different, the market gives a premium rating to original brilliance.

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1911 proof sets in boxes seem to all(?) tone to a blue green colour. This consistency suggests to me that it is the internal padding material, or at least the dye with which it is coloured which is responsible.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1911 proof sets in boxes seem to all(?) tone to a blue green colour. This consistency suggests to me that it is the internal padding material, or at least the dye with which it is coloured which is responsible.

Agreed, i don't think i've seen any which haven't toned to some degree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob,

I think you make an interesting point as to toning with 1911's. Often wondered why this should be. Makes sense.

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming of course that the bidders have the first clue about what they were bidding on! If you sit in enough salerooms you'll see plenty of jaw droppers and they all just confirm one thing, "a fool and his/her money...."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×