Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Nonmortuus

Opinions please 1820 Half Crown

Recommended Posts

Hi all, could have some opinions on the following please before I take the plunge?

1820 Half Crown

I believe it to be EF but wanted a second opinion. Also do you feel the toning is natural?

Is there anything about this that concerns you? Does it look polished etc?

Thanks

Non

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not my thing but looks like it might of had a rub?

I may well be wrong ,just does not look right to me .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks as though it may have been cleaned

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the fast replies. I was worried that it had been polished. Also is that sort of rainbow toning gnerally frowned upon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't quite make EF for me. perhaps GVF / NEF, and the obverse in particular definitely looks polished.

I quite like natural toning, I find it can be very attractive if it's not patchy. I wouldn't describe this coin as having 'rainbow' toning however, that suggests to me the kind of unnatural effects that some US collectors seem to prefer, even when obtained artificially, for example

rainbow-toning-example.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the colour is really an issue, as it's not rainbow toning in the classic sense.

I also think it may of had an obverse polish, with quite a few field marks, especially in the right field.

Definitely an in-hand coin, and something you'd have to be 100% happy you could return without fuss or argument. I don't recognise the seller, so couldn't comment on his honour.

Good luck, NM :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a big £ difference between VF and EF makes this dangerous ground.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a big £ difference between VF and EF makes this dangerous ground.

I completely agree.

My grade assessment of GVF on the obverse is based on this seller's pic (It's all we have to go on, as usual)

1820_hc_obv01.png

For me there is too much wear on the ear, the leaves and the hair, in particular, for it to make EF. Other opinions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reverse is considerably better! Look at the 'hip coil' on the angel, and the thistle for example? Also the rim in the second quarter?

It's difficult to technically grade the obverse, as we are all pretty much agreed it's polished (possibly)! However, overall, taking the entire coin into account (not the eye-appeal, lustre or tone, or scratches), I'm still going with EF! BUT, that's not to say EF money! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, the reverse is considerably better. And definitely NOT EF money, with all those digs and dings on the obv!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do enjoy these grading debates, love hearing how others view things.

1820_hc_rev_comparison.png

It's possible that I have become a little too strict over recent years, but I would expect an EF later milled piece to at least show the lions' faces. Seller's pics on the left, my example of the same type on the right. As a benchmark, I would grade mine as EF, with " Slight wear on high spots on close inspection, and all other detail clear and sharp", while, for me, the coin on the left clearly has more wear than that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If its cleaned ,keep your money in your pocket as another one will turn up.

If you buy one and decide to sell ,someone else will buy it if its problem free.

Pete.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do enjoy these grading debates, love hearing how others view things.

1820_hc_rev_comparison.png

It's possible that I have become a little too strict over recent years, but I would expect an EF later milled piece to at least show the lions' faces. Seller's pics on the left, my example of the same type on the right. As a benchmark, I would grade mine as EF, with " Slight wear on high spots on close inspection, and all other detail clear and sharp", while, for me, the coin on the left clearly has more wear than that

Even taking the polish out of this conversation, there is a massive difference in strike/die-wear and clogs - especially so between these two coins.

Many of the components BELOW the traditional wear areas are also very muted on the OP coin...the feathers of the angel's wing, the feathering on the legs of the lions, etc..

Unfortunately your cropped images take the reverses out of context, as the rim on the second quarter, thistle and main crown on the OP coin are major considerations in deciding die-wear, at least they are for me anyway?

Now, don't get me wrong, because I am not defending this coin at all, I most certainly wouldn't buy it, and wouldn't recommend that NM does either.

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good point, Stu, well made :)

I am genuinely interested in understanding your thought process, it definitely sounds more sophisticated than mine!

Here are comparison pics of the 2 reverses in full:

1820_hc_rev_comparison_02.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing sophisticated at all, Paul, your's is clearly a better coin, and a far superior image!

I'm guessing CGS gave your's EF? But then we are onto a different ball game altogether.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also going with GVF/NEF, its had a clean at some Point in its life, retoned Naturally/artificially but the tone highlights the dings/nicks and previous polishing/cleaning wonderfully, especially on the REV. I'm sure Londoncoins has a few for sale in their auction..

Take a Look, its free and you can also bid there :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, look, I've been taking a long look at this coin again this morning, but on the laptop this time, and will concede to NEF overall, but obviously polished and retoned at some point, so worth peanuts to a seasoned collector.

However, I'd still like to know the grade that CGS gave the other one, Paulus? Especially as this was the coin used to beat me into submission and force the grade of the other one down by a half-grade in my eyes! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×