Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

basecamp

Coin aquisition of the week.......

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, azda said:

after speaking with Rob i decided to buy this Edward IV Rose Noble S1951

Screenshot 2018-11-12 14.04.12.png

Not bad! Welcome back to the table, Outlaw...you watched it, yet? :)

Edited by Coinery

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Coinery said:

Not bad! Welcome back to the table, Outlaw...you watched it, yet? :)

Eh up Stewie, not seen Outlaw, i have however got addicted to Outlander 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My latest for this week, another gap filled in the 3d collection😃 the pictures are from LCGS my pictures through the slab are not the best. Its the only 3d I have that is slabbed, what's your thought on breaking it out??

1869141511_1884ThreepenceRevLC400.jpg.b5d082d1dff06616a336cac7bb14eff8.jpg1585144886_1884ThreepenceObvLC400.jpg.10441db39b8aec252f1e4dca44c5c527.jpg

My Pictures Below😞

1070602243_1884ThreepenceRevLCSlabbed400.jpg.9240d53c9cd2f09c90cbea6c94defecd.jpg757248992_1884ThreepenceObvLCSlabbed400.jpg.0f5ac218bf8925b5aa2924756c3a3b5d.jpg

Edited by UPINSMOKE
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks to be a very nice example, they are extremely difficult to photograph through the slab aren't they!

As far as breaking it out, it's each to their own in my view, with a number of considerations to be taken into account, not least of which is how you currently store and display the rest of your collection?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That Noble is an absolute belter.  Well done Azda 😊

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, UPINSMOKE said:

My latest for this week, another gap filled in the 3d collection😃 the pictures are from LCGS my pictures through the slab are not the best. Its the only 3d I have that is slabbed, what's your thought on breaking it out??

I think it does depends a bit on what grade is written on the slab. If the number is not very high, like 75, then it probably won't matter much whether it remains in the slab or not. Such a grade is not going to make the coin more marketable when you eventually move it on anyway. And it is nice to keep your coins in the same type of display.

Edited by Sword

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Sword said:

I think it does depends a bit on what grade is written on the slab. If the number is not very high, like 75, then it probably won't matter much whether it remains in the slab or not. Such a grade is not going to make the coin more marketable when you eventually move it on anyway. 

I agree to an extent, and would be interested to know the grade? CGS 75 is supposedly aUNC, which cannot surely be regarded as not a high grade? I suspect the given grade is a little higher though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sword said:

I think it does depends a bit on what grade is written on the slab. If the number is not very high, like 75, then it probably won't matter much whether it remains in the slab or not. Such a grade is not going to make the coin more marketable when you eventually move it on anyway. And it is nice to keep your coins in the same type of display.

 

1 hour ago, Paulus said:

I agree to an extent, and would be interested to know the grade? CGS 75 is supposedly aUNC, which cannot surely be regarded as not a high grade? I suspect the given grade is a little higher though?

Thank you both for your comments the coin in question is graded at CGS 65 so it's not as you both thought. So perhaps its time to break it free from its plastic tomb😲I currently keep all my coins in quadrums☺️

Edited by UPINSMOKE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love those shillings, the hair really gives ole Vick a near-classic Greek look...Nice

 

Look at PCGS site at the 1863/1 shilling.....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In hand the toning has a greener tinge than shown. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rob said:

In hand the toning has a greener tinge than shown. 

It does indeed. I think I need to experiment with the back ground colour I am using to get the colours to look more like they do in hand. If I order some different colour neoprene I will upload some pictures of a coin on different back grounds for comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Picked up this at DNW today (auction pics) for what I thought was a very reasonable price - I assume the French Arms at Date was an error/mistake, does anyone know any different?

1723_sh_french_arms_at_date_01_ref_01756_dnw_nov_2018_lot_1012_auction_pics_02.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't think of any logical reason other than a mistake. The same goes for the various transposed shield varieties in W3. You would think it would be obvious at the time that a mistake was being made, so maybe the reason for the positional errors is related to the order in which the various components were entered on the die? I presume we will never know. None of the 74 items listed by Hocking for W3 tell you anything about the transposed shields, nor is there anything on the French arms at date shilling.

Clearly the four shields were entered separately, otherwise the order wouldn't be wrong in several combinations. The existence of the C/SS in the last quarter variety is also likely to be a mistake and suggests that the letters in the angles were added late on. I think it likely the legend was entered penultimately to the angle fillers if used, as it would be easier to fill the gaps between the crowns, than to enter the legend and hope the gap left to accommodate the crowns is sufficient. The Garter star is the favourite to be entered first as it means you can align the shield points with the arms of the cross.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Rob said:

I can't think of any logical reason other than a mistake. The same goes for the various transposed shield varieties in W3. You would think it would be obvious at the time that a mistake was being made, so maybe the reason for the positional errors is related to the order in which the various components were entered on the die? I presume we will never know. None of the 74 items listed by Hocking for W3 tell you anything about the transposed shields, nor is there anything on the French arms at date shilling.

Clearly the four shields were entered separately, otherwise the order wouldn't be wrong in several combinations. The existence of the C/SS in the last quarter variety is also likely to be a mistake and suggests that the letters in the angles were added late on. I think it likely the legend was entered penultimately to the angle fillers if used, as it would be easier to fill the gaps between the crowns, than to enter the legend and hope the gap left to accommodate the crowns is sufficient. The Garter star is the favourite to be entered first as it means you can align the shield points with the arms of the cross.

Thanks Rob, makes perfect sense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally arrived, doesn't look like a 1967 penny Rob 😉

Noble Joined.jpg

Edited by azda
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arrived this morning. 

1115563836_1-Copy.jpg.05b3962f9da347e8c9ee1a61179f0119.jpg

 

1967343794_2-Copy.jpg.45a3f444bf4e6d64c32e3cd64d47c27a.jpg

 

  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second that! A wonderful coin. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Yes indeed. Though it has strange matt finish...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, azda said:

Finally arrived, doesn't look like a 1967 penny Rob 😉

Noble Joined.jpg

That is an absolute stunner, Dave!  I haven’t seen a more beautiful coin outside Victorian bronze pennies!  For that you could have my wife and daughter!  But if you wanted my granddaughter you’d have to throw in a little Angel!

(hope that’s not too subtle 😉)

Jerry

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

‘Tis a gorgeous coin, Dave, no doubt about it! Why the high-end, big value, strategy? It’s a fantasy strategy of mine too to collect top-end...I’m failing mostly in that I have to keep selling my collection when it hits the £10k point 😩

My entire collection now has a total value under £50, an 1897 penny and  G6 halfcrown.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

10 hours ago, jelida said:

That is an absolute stunner, Dave!  I haven’t seen a more beautiful coin outside Victorian bronze pennies!  For that you could have my wife and daughter!  But if you wanted my granddaughter you’d have to throw in a little Angel!

(hope that’s not too subtle 😉)

Jerry

Lol, thanks Jerry, but i have enough with 2 daughters and a Turkish Frau 🙂

1 hour ago, Coinery said:

‘Tis a gorgeous coin, Dave, no doubt about it! Why the high-end, big value, strategy? It’s a fantasy strategy of mine too to collect top-end...I’m failing mostly in that I have to keep selling my collection when it hits the £10k point 😩

My entire collection now has a total value under £50, an 1897 penny and  G6 halfcrown.

Stewie, i had a few euros on the side and had been eyeing this one for a good 6 months and think i got it cheap for the grade, i have a few other coins on the wish list that would hold their value, so i guess it's about preserving the wealth outside of a bank as they can't be trusted IMO. Several things attracted me to it, strike, it wasn't ragged around the rim, fairly centred, flan wasn't wavy, so it had a lot going for it.....

 

Edited by azda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, azda said:

 

Lol, thanks Jerry, but i have enough with 2 daughters and a Turkish Frau 🙂

Stewie, i had a few euros on the side and had been eyeing this one for a good 6 months and think i got it cheap for the grade, i have a few other coins on the wish list that would hold their value, so i guess it's about preserving the wealth outside of a bank as they can't be trusted IMO.

 

Sounds like a plan, Stan :) 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×