Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Madness

Madness' Coin Grading Training Ground

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Madness said:

@1949threepence  Are there any principles underlying this dark art?  Principles and guidelines?  I'm here to learn.

In a sense, yes. For example certain coins in certain years are known to have die wear problem. I'll just take the 1906 penny as a prime example. The reverse of the 1906 has a reputation for die wear, and mine is no exception. It's otherwise EF with some residual lustre, but the reverse only looks fine in places, especially parts of Britannia.

This is in addition to what Peck says above, which I totally agree with.

Take a look:-

 

1906 reverse.jpg

1906 obverse.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what an EF reverse from that era should look like, big difference:-

 

1902 reverse.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Source: @Rob second example:

Given that I was too harsh at my last attempt: 

Grading guestimate: VF -  Significant wear, but localised to the higher points   

What are the parallel lines on the obverse?  They seem too even and straight to be cleaning.  Is this what adjustment looks like?

Thanks again.

Shilling 3 OR.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, die wear can manifest in all manner of different ways. For example, note the way the 9 on this 1891 penny tends to lack a tail and runs into nothing. That's pure die wear:-

 

1891.jpg

Edited by 1949threepence
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My grading guestimate: EF   

What do you think would be a reasonable amount to pay for this example?

Z4MtRje.jpg

 

t2wj9DM.jpg

 

Edited by Madness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, grading wise I'd say a/EF. 

Not sure on price as not my speciality. Bot someone else will know for sure. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't say (apart from agreeing with the grade). When I was dealing, these could be picked up for £50 or even less. Probably much more now, but I personally wouldn't pay £100 even for an EF example. But that's a personal judgement.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guestimate: Extremely Fine 

t6i71a9.jpg

 

This has been graded by an auction house as "Very Fine".  Am I missing something?  There is very little wear, and that restricted to high points.  It doesn't appear to have been cleaned.  Are the small marks on the coin the items that bring the grade down?  I've seen TPG services list the same coin with a similar amount of wear as "UNC".  It even seems to be a nice strike with no obvious die defects of any significance.  What am I doing wrong?

Edited by Madness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Madness said:

My guestimate: Extremely Fine 

t6i71a9.jpg

 

This has been graded by an auction house as "Very Fine".  Am I missing something?  There is very little wear, and that restricted to high points.  It doesn't appear to have been cleaned.  Are the small marks on the coin the items that bring the grade down?  I've seen TPG services list the same coin with a similar amount of wear as "UNC".  It even seems to be a nice strike with no obvious die defects of any significance.  What am I doing wrong?

No, I don't think you are missing anything. Nice coin with, as you say, negligible wear to the very highest surfaces only. The coin has that unmistakeable crispness which pertains to EF level.

A straight EF from me too.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too - obverse is perhaps GEF

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/25/2018 at 10:16 AM, Madness said:

Source: @Rob second example:

Given that I was too harsh at my last attempt: 

Grading guestimate: VF -  Significant wear, but localised to the higher points   

What are the parallel lines on the obverse?  They seem too even and straight to be cleaning.  Is this what adjustment looks like?

Thanks again.

Shilling 3 OR.jpg

I know what they are !!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are part of my  pattern I can see close up to the A or Gratia the tell tale sequence I see all the time note the way the parallel lines have a slight crenulation it you were to view them from the side angle the lines would merge...ooopss  I am not supposed to be talking about this !

 

CM180805-171126002 (304x500).jpg

CM180805-171054001.jpg

Edited by DrLarry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will post these pictures of your line question on my own wacky thread with the interpretation of how after taking an image of those lines the exact same mathematical relationships exist.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guestimate: Obverse - GVF Reverse - VF

 

ak7oo7d.jpg

 

TAzHtoU.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Madness said:

My guestimate: Obverse - GVF Reverse - VF

 

ak7oo7d.jpg

 

TAzHtoU.jpg

 

Maybe the photography detracts slightly on that one @Madness - perhaps a bit too much light on the obverse? Based on screen appearance I'd say VF on both sides. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1787 Sixpence

My guestimate: EF  

I almost gave this GEF.  While it lacks many of the finer details of the Pingo proof, I think this relates to die issues rather than wear.  One of the first points of wear on these coins appears to be the tips and edges of the top laurels.  There's next to no wear here on this example.  I'm not sure if the lack of detail on the frills of his shirt around the neck relate to wear of or die issues, similarly with the bottom right curl of hair.  The top of the reverse has a weak strike as does the Honoverian shield.  The details in the Hibernian harp are excellent for a circulation coin. There are some hairline scratches on the obverse and flecking on the reverse.  Good amount of remaining lustre.  

I'm still having trouble differentiating between die issues and wear.  I'm also having difficulty interpreting the reflections in images and determining how they relate to wear.  

Feedback please!

btw, what value does Spink give to the various grades of a run-of-the-mill 1787 sixpence?

Edit: The seller has listed this as a 1787 Shilling.  I believe that it's actually a sixpence because of 

a. The extra detail in George III's hair to the left of the laurels and

b. The left of the base of the bottom of the hair-ribbon loop is squarer and consequently slightly closer to GIII's neck in the shilling than in the sixpence

I've asked the seller for diameter measurements in order to confirm.

 

YEi1ygE.jpg

 

TFvKfnJ.jpg

 

Edited by Madness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The legend above the head says it is a sixpence.Shillings have a stop or a space.

It looks to be quite good where you can see the detail with the caveat that some bits aren't clear because of the lighting. The toning looks random and untouched - which is a good sign.

Spink prices are Fine 15, VF 45, EF 115.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Rob said:

The legend above the head says it is a sixpence.Shillings have a stop or a space.

It looks to be quite good where you can see the detail with the caveat that some bits aren't clear because of the lighting. The toning looks random and untouched - which is a good sign.

Spink prices are Fine 15, VF 45, EF 115.

Thanks Rob.  There is a stop over George's head here, though, isn't there?  What grade would you give?

Edited by Madness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but the legend has much closer spacing on the 6d. The shilling has the legend spaced either side of the top of the head with a distinct gap between III and DEI, with or without an intervening stop.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rob said:

Yes but the legend has much closer spacing on the 6d. The shilling has the legend spaced either side of the top of the head with a distinct gap between III and DEI, with or without an intervening stop.

Ah!  I see what you mean thanks.  Does haymarking detract from grade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Madness said:

Ah!  I see what you mean thanks.  Does haymarking detract from grade?

No. Grade is wear dependant. It may however affect the aesthetics which will determine the amount a person is willing to pay, but that depends on the individual.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Madness said:

I'm still having trouble differentiating between die issues and wear.  I'm also having difficulty interpreting the reflections in images and determining how they relate to wear.  

Feedback please!

 

The short answer is that die issues are very localised and will be seen in the same particular place(s) on many top grade examples. Wear tends to be more generalised, starting from the highest points of the design and spreading downwards.

I'm not sure what you mean by reflections in relation to wear?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duplicate - Sorry

Edited by Madness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nonmortuus said:

Generally yes.

I've just cleared up this issue with Michael.  He said that "bright" does not mean dipped for the coins he sells and that he would mention any evidence of cleaning or dipping when describing the coin.  Given his reputation and demeanor in my dealings with him I believe him entirely.  

Made final payment for a 1787 shilling and sixpence and am looking forward to the arrival of same.

A quote from his email:  

As I always say to every collector “I will always give you a full refund for the coin if you are unhappy for any reason and wish to return it” !

Needless to say I'll be buying from him again as the experience has been far more pleasant than the baptism of fire I got through eBay.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×