Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

newheart

DALTON & HAMER TOKEN Grading

Recommended Posts

I downloaded a free copy of PROVINCIAL TOKEN-COINAGE OF THE 18th CENTURY ILLUSTRATED BY R. DALTON & S. H. HAMER 1910. In it the authors describe coins as R, RR and RRR, I think it is a scale of rarity but cannot see a definition in the book. Rare, Really Rare, Really Really Rare? TIA, Pete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, newheart said:

I downloaded a free copy of PROVINCIAL TOKEN-COINAGE OF THE 18th CENTURY ILLUSTRATED BY R. DALTON & S. H. HAMER 1910. In it the authors describe coins as R, RR and RRR, I think it is a scale of rarity but cannot see a definition in the book. Rare, Really Rare, Really Really Rare? TIA, Pete

Traditionally, it went from 1 to 5 Rs. The last is unique. Make your own definition up for the others because they are all uncertain numbers. A bit like the Freeman or ESC splits, where you treat the actual number with a pinch of salt, because they are frequently adrift from reality too, it's just that people want to believe in what they read and love to assign an absolute number to things, especially the ones that say unique, or nearly so. ;).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rob. So is RRR scarcer than R? And does "Scarce", when used in the Dalton book, mean more scarce than any number of Rs? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, newheart said:

Thanks Rob. So is RRR scarcer than R? And does "Scarce", when used in the Dalton book, mean more scarce than any number of Rs? 

Scarce is more common than R. Also, if looking at Peck for example, a currency thing assigned as very rare can equate to multiples of the numbers for many patterns assigned VR. Do your homework and assign the rarity ratings you think apply. Every R, S, N or C and their subdivisions in whatever tome is simply a guestimate. Not everything that is written should be taken as gospel, but equally, everything that is written gives you a starting point that you can adjust along the way as your knowledge improves, so is still inherently useful.

Edited by Rob
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Rob. You said " if looking at Peck for example" - I have no idea what or who Peck is, sorry. You will wish you had never replied ;-)

I quite agree these books were written a long time ago and the rarities given may not be accurate, but as you say, they are a useful starting point.

So to recap, in order of increasing scarcity, we have:

Scarce - R - RR - RRR 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, Michael Marsh, author of The Gold Sovereign, has an easy to understand rarity rating guide although I'm not sure if different rarity rating scales are used with specific coins (it would obviously be Sovereigns in this case):

C3 - Extremely Common

C2 - Very Common

C - Common

N - Normal

S - Scarce

R - Rare

R2 - Very Rare

R3 - Extremely Rare

R4 - 11 - 20 examples estimated to have survived

R5 - 5 - 10 examples estimated to have survived

R6 - 3 or 4 examples known to exist

R7 - 1 or 2 examples known to exist

Just another data point for consideration...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Madcap. At this time I am just trying to decipher the ratings used by Dalton and Hamer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotcha...so there are multiple rarity rating scales with different rating criteria?  Ugh.  Love for it to be like the Hobbit...one scale to rule them all. :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure if they created their own scarcity rating system, but the book is from 1910. This is an example of their token ratings:

 

temp3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is that all these numbers are relative because there is no way in any shape or form that you are going to be able to compile an accurate corpus for anything but the rarest items, and even then it isn't guaranteed.

If Peck (author of the BM catalogue published in 1958, English Copper, Tin and Bronze Coins in the BM 1558-1958) assigned a rarity to a variety, it was always going to be loosely based on his personal experience over the years. The same goes for Alan Rayner and ESC where the rarities are way out in some cases. Nobody can be expected to find all examples of anything, not least because a lot of collectors hold things close to their chest, or maybe haven't looked hard enough at the coin in the first place. Some things are mis-atttributed. There is no failsafe method of catching all examples and rejecting all mis-attributions, just what you can work out yourself.

Edited by Rob
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Rob said:

Peck (author of the BM catalogue published in 1958, English Copper, Tin and Bronze Coins in the BM 1558-1958)

Is this book available as a pdf? I looked online but can only see it in printed version (and expensive at that!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, newheart said:

Is this book available as a pdf? I looked online but can only see it in printed version (and expensive at that!)

Yep. Not cheap, but invaluable. And no, not available online. The internet wasn't about in 1958.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rob said:

Yep. Not cheap, but invaluable. And no, not available online. The internet wasn't about in 1958.

The internet wasn't about in 1910 either, but I have a pdf of  DALTON and HAMER ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody has scanned it in in that case. You are better of with the book though, as you have to keep going to and fro from description to the plates which are at the back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am guessing it is out of copyright now so someone has scanned it. I prefer it as a pdf (call me new-school!) because you can search for any text string. Good point about the photos if they are all in the back. Well I guess a copy of Pecks will have to go on my shopping list!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×