-
Posts
2,852 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
66
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Articles
Posts posted by Nordle11
-
-
Still a nice one. I can see why you ummed and ahhed about it though
-
It's good for me, my buying power increased by about 20% overnight
-
-
Nothing extra than it's face value, it's not worth the time trying to sell it. Spend it!
-
What an excellent find! I'm still waiting to find anything worth more than 25p in a 25p bowl
-
1
-
-
I had a faint memory it was you Jerry, and that he also lived pretty close to you too..
-
1 hour ago, 1949threepence said:
An indication of just how rare they are.
The info I have in my sheet on these is as follows;
Die # 1 - 0 known examples
Die # 2 - 7 known examples
Die # 3 - 5 known examples
Die # 4 - 10-15 known examples
Die # 5 - 2 known examples
-
I found the PM, £841 and someone on here got it
-
1 hour ago, 1949threepence said:
I never have, nor do I have any idea of what one would fetch at auction. Obviously they're extremely rare, with a only a few or one example known of each.
Any ideas/experiences chaps?
Thanks in advance

Do you not remember the one on eBay about 5 or 6 months ago? I even PM'd you about it lol
£800 odd I think it went for.
-
It still looks like m to me..
-
Also no idea about rev. I lol. Maybe he excluded it for visual purposes (i.e so it's not mistaken for a 1 or an l (el))
-
26 minutes ago, Rob said:
Presumably this will come naturally to most people here, but what is the Gouby reverse for a narrow date 1876H? Reverse j says 1874 only, rev. m doesn't have the rock by the linear circle, nor the protruding one on the RHS. The trident is closer to the linear circle than the top of the P as for rev.k. The lighthouse looks like rev. ja, which is only for 1874,5,& 7, but Britannia's hair is in any case longer than for ja and more like j whilst the back of the helmet is more like ja as well. And one final question, who nicked rev. l?
All this makes sense as a Freeman reverse K however.
Ta.
Gouby M. Freeman K as you've said.
Gouby L+m & Freeman 8+k
-
Bugger, at least I think it's 296, it's the first I've tried to attribute so I could be a mile off!
-
4 minutes ago, Paulus said:
Lovely coin Matt, here's my somewhat poorer example from a later year, which I believe to be D&H 398:
Check what (if anything) it says on the edge, mine says
“PAYABLE x IN x LONDON x OR x ANGLESEY x”
Oooo, didn't know there could be edge writing. I will have a look when I have it with me
-
15 minutes ago, brg5658 said:
@Nordle11, lovely token! It looks to have a great strike, great color with some original red, and great luster. I'd say I think it would graded MS64 or MS65 RB on this side of the pond, but I had a token I bought raw and submitted that came back MS63RB, and I was sure it was better than that. So, it's MS -- and gorgeous, and IMO would fetch $200 quite easily. Below are my two similar examples to yours (I'm horrible at attribution of these Druid tokens -- I always have to sit down with my book open, and a magnifying glass -- the differences are often VERY small). Each of my examples were purchased for $225, some 3 and 2 year ago (respectively). Congrats on the new purchase!
I was waiting for you to come along, thanks Brandon
I'm glad it meets your expectations, it signifies to me that I've done well haha. Fitting too as these druid tokens were the ones that piqued my interest in conders in the first place. I had no idea of grade or value because I don't normally spot them in such a nice grade to compare, so I thought I would put down a healthy bid - it ended up going well under than that anyway ($45).
I have to say, I too found it a bit of a job trying to attribute it, the Dalton & Hamer is quite comprehensive, plenty of zooming in and out!
Thanks again for the info and the examples you've put up, always a great help.
-
1
-
-
-
I got this the other day, I pay a bit of attention to tokens but haven't had the chance to pick up a nice one that isn't too expensive. I think I got this at a fair price, but due to lack of experience I'd appreciate if anyone can give a ballpark figure on the value?
I look forward to learning more about it when I get it in hand.
-
1
-
-
Jammy bugger, nice high tide Jerry.
-
8 hours ago, Rob said:
Remind me. I see Feb 1970 in the other thread. Is that it?
Sorry thought this was the same thread! They were;
Feb 1970
April, June and November 1977
-
Wouldn't say no to that, cheers Declan
-
1
-
-
Would you mind if I took the ones that I mentioned in previous posts if you happen upon them?
-
Welcome to the forum Mark, glad you decided to settle here and post

Also well done on doing some prior research, the more you know the less you'll get stung (although count on being stung at least a few times lol), many people dive in head first and realise after they've spent too much on not a lot.
You'll have to do a bit of research if you're doing a particular year because there are some around that decade that can cost you an arm and a leg, for instance a 1902 half crown will cost you 120-180 for a nice UNC one, whereas the same coin from 1905 will cost you 500 in a very poor grade. There are also some denominations that were not struck for certain years so there's that to consider too.
Sounds like a good start to collecting though, look forward to seeing some pictures! Any doubts on grades on prices, put up a post as there are many here that will help with anything you're unsure about.
-
The first picture of the obverse is definitely better focused, but once in focus I think they look good!
My cushion was beige

-
1
-
-
Looking good Hazelman. Show us the reverse!
Ebay's Worst Offerings
in Free for all
Posted
This guy must really need a quick £15