Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

argentumandcoins

Accomplished Collector
  • Posts

    1,503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by argentumandcoins

  1. 4 minutes ago, Flash said:

    I met my wife in Mr Smiths nightclub in 1989. This was in Warrington though so perhaps just a name coincidence.

    I spent 15 weeks in Warrington in 1996 training to be a cop, during which time I drank in multiple bars before heading to the Shag Raft (Showboat) or Smiths. I don't remember much about the lessons in class as I slept through most of the morning ones....

     

  2. 1 hour ago, Rob said:

    It could be a 0, but looks a bit round for 0, or weren't they elongated? Sorry, don't have one to compare.

    I wouldn't worry about the alignment, as the last two were entered separately.

    Yes the 0 is more elongated having checked against another. Either a sideways/inverted 6 or a trick of the eye!

    Re the last 2 my thought was that the chap responsible was clearly having a bad day so could well have made a hash of the 6.

  3. Frank, firstly you're replying to a post that was written 9 years ago (not much chance of them still wanting folders that are common) and secondly every spambot in the world will pick up your email address and flood you (suggest deleting your replies).

    4 minutes ago, Guest Frank chapman said:

    Hi in reply to your message I have a set of halfcrowns in a Whitman folder I am willing to sell, if you would like to know more my email address is fr8kch8p@hotmail.com. Cheers frank 

     

  4. 6 minutes ago, Coinery said:

    This slabbing thing still amazes me!  Yes, weak strike, soft strike, clogged devices...yet, with even all that taken into consideration, there is still nothing about even the best of the remaining devices that could warrant the grade! 

    152705034251

     

    Just goes to show that if you buy slabbed coins you should leave your eyes (and brain) at the door on the way into the shop. AU50 must mean less than VF on PCGS does it? I'm no expert on that issue but if I was grading on appearance it would come in around Fine.

  5. I recently found one of the above in a bulk lot from auction. It's only Fair but the first one that I have had in stock. Having had a good look under the glass I am wondering if ESC et al have (and continue to) incorrectly assumed what the coin actually is? The first bust Shilling uses an Arabic 1 so where did the Roman 1 appear from? Apologies if already established but I cannot find any reference ont tinternet to it.

    IMG_1818_zpshzbccfpx.jpg

     

     

  6. 9 minutes ago, Rob said:

    Using third parties also spreads the risk. What happens when the mint takes everything under its control? Who covers the cost of a bad commercial judgement when they make 100K and only sell a few thousand pieces? Unsurprisingly, it is you and me. By selling in bulk to third parties, the Mint's manufacturing costs are recouped much quicker than if they had to stockpile and then sell enough to cover expenditure. Having moved on ten thousand pieces and received payment, that money can be put to good use. Economies work best when the velocity of money is high. The shorter the time between expenditure and recovery, the quicker you can develop the next product.

    I'm sorry, but you are living in an ideal world where everything is under state control, commercial profits are banned and we all live thanks to the benevolence of our political masters. Many people in this country earn money on the back of government activity, and yes, they profit from it.

    Alternatively known as Jezzavision.....

  7. 5 hours ago, VickySilver said:

    IMO, I don't like either of those and the "3" in date with even more corruption. I just can't get my eye to follow the truncated curve of whatever is descending from the crossbar of the 7, and come to either a 6 or broken 8. I could almost make the unlikely case of a broken 0 as well. I don't know, I think the null hypothesis is that it isn't anything [but a diebreak(s)] with bits of loss and loss of defined edges to the datals.

    Totally plausible. A low grade example like this one leaves all bets on the table sadly. As Stuart says, surely there must be a better specimen out there for study whether it's a damaged die or man made error. 

×
×
  • Create New...