Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

krasnaya_vityaz

Numismatic Research Group
  • Posts

    240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by krasnaya_vityaz

  1. I don't think the die on the 1754 1/2d matches the coin, the 5 in the date has a higher serif in the numeral than on the die. Nitpicking I know. But I would think the BM would get it right.

  2. I got a retaliatory negative from a buyer, they did not ever pay - but claimed to pay. What was ironic and rather interesting was that when I notified eBay of the non paying bidder issue, their account got suspended and to get it unsuspended they would have to have paid me etc. I refused. At that point since the jerk negged me I let them sit in suspension for 30 days and not get to bid on more junque.

  3. What's this ? A case of what I tell you three times is true KV?

    I think everyone is forgetting that by 2010 the old biddy will be pushing up Royal daisies and it will be our immortal leader T Blair (He Who Must Not Be Pushed..) on the coins. Never mind the British public - the rest of Europe will never allow it!!!

    I rather think the old biddy will like to live a good long life much like her maternal link, and will live well into 2028 or so so that Princess Chuckycam can be 81 whence she ascends the throne. Then you might want to disinfect whatever monetary instrument comes thou way, as whom only ponders where it have been.

  4. It should be true, but:

    1) there is no silver or amalgam remains.

    2) the lines on the shield are too good for moulding.

    May be it's a pattern or copper probe of a new mill?

    Often times the silver plating on these was rather thin. It flaked off not long after the piece was made, basically it served the purpose for the maker or immediate possessor of said piece and they didn't have to worry about it afterwards. In my estimation this piece was not cast as you suggest, but probably die struck then plated. As such it is more fascinating, as it involved more effort than taking a host coin and creating a mould from it then casting more coins. The lettering and design elements of the coin are too sharp to suggest it having been cast. As this involved more effort, it was more professionally executed and is subsequently more interesting in a study of such pieces.

  5. One matter of consideration, at least for the British public, is the mere fact that the British Pound has never been called in for example in 1000 to 1 exchanges that practically every other country in Europe have had to endure. In essence, whilst the Sterling have indeed lost some of its lustre from the past, it has retained enough of a value to not have been rendered insignificant by inflation as currencies such as the French Franc, Italian Lire, German Mark etc. have in the past.

    One matter of consideration, at least for the British public, is the mere fact that the British Pound has never been called in for example in 1000 to 1 exchanges that practically every other country in Europe have had to endure. In essence, whilst the Sterling have indeed lost some of its lustre from the past, it has retained enough of a value to not have been rendered insignificant by inflation as currencies such as the French Franc, Italian Lire, German Mark etc. have in the past.

  6. There was a programme on the telee about higher traces of mercury being detected in the 1935 LB and 1947 coins. However I have not seen any real determinate substantion of that.

    The significance of higher traces of mercury would indicate that perhaps the gold had been smelted from dental fillings.

  7. I was lucky enough to find this coin whilst metal detecting and thought you may like to see it, its a Charles ii Scottish Merk 1672 with a reversed 2, the coin is in as found condition, thanks in advance for any help with a value.

    You're a lucky person, it's obviously rare. Spink 2003 edition gives a value of Fine £150, VF £400 and EF £1250 or approximately twice that for a normal version. The value though will depend on the degree of corrosion. The obverse looks as though it is badly pitted and although in quite good grade probably doesn't make fine as a result. This will depress its value although the reverse looks better.

    I believe that UK dealers would sell this as a fine, an example of grading up for age. The corrosion on the piece took a toll on an otherwise very nice piece. Typically these Merks are found in rather very heavily circulated condition.

  8. I tell you what, since I've switched to manual member approval I've been getting 3-5 attempts everyday from people with .ru email addresses and/or registering names like cheap-vigra and win-casino!

    When someone registers a new account now, there is a message saying that accounts registered from certain countries will not be approved until the registrant emails to show a genuine interest etc etc. I've emailed a couple of suspect accounts but they didn't reply and therefore got zapped.

    The results are good though, since being picky about who is allowed in, there has been less spam.

    Gees to think, I think my email address for here is a .ru :ph34r:

  9. China, Board of Public Revenue Mint in Beijing. I would have to see an image of the obverse with the emperor's name, but these are most likely from the reign of Chien Lung(1736-1795), they are valued at about 15p each. They were made in the billions, and I personally have many many dozens of them with the rest of my voluminous Chinese collection.

×
×
  • Create New...