-
Posts
3,651 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
173
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Articles
Posts posted by Peckris 2
-
-
Thanks. Your latest pictures are much better, and I'd say your coin is not a problem - it's struck slightly off centre, but that's not unusual for early milled.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Paddy said:
I think it is a half crown rather than a shilling, but for that the weight should be 15.05g, so still light and therefore dubious.
I agree - it looks kosher so probably a misdiagnosed denomination. But I'd say $150 is still B bit on the steep side for the most common 2/6 in the series.
-
1
-
-
What denomination is it? Difficult to comment without knowing the size of it. I would guess 6d but if you could enlighten us...?
-
21 hours ago, Chris Perkins said:
Yes, it does seem to be normal speed again. He (host) turned it off and on again!
-
1
-
-
-
3 hours ago, King Kenny said:
Nice coins.
Sorry, but I am not a Liverpool supporter.
So what's King Kenny all about???
-
Nice to see another Liverpool supporter on here!
-
Unusual to see a token with the king's head?
-
Good Fair / Fine +
There's not enough hair detail on the obverse to rate as F
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Dave Everitt said:
Windows is covered above, but on Mac OS X the free bundled Preview will resize an image and let you know the file size in Kb.
If you're in Preview on a Mac, go into the Tools menu, then Adjust size...
-
19 hours ago, Ukstu said:
If anyone is still after this let me know i have a digital copy you can have.
Stu.
Yes please - PM me.
-
1 minute ago, Dave Everitt said:
I see everyone laughing! But to be totally clear, please bear with me and help correct my Cu-era Vic coinage ignorance LOL - I presume that’s a ’38 halfpenny?
Looking at the size of the legend characters I would say it's a farthing (though not so easy to tell from an angled picture) . A halfpenny is just a bit smaller than the later florin, the farthing is roughly the size of a 6d.
-
23 hours ago, Paddy said:
Something is wrong here I think. There shouldn't be any 1838 pennies?
Are you perhaps looking at a halfpenny instead? Both farthings and halfpennies for 1838 exist. (The changeover from Copper to Bronze means the copper halfpenny is larger than the corresponding bronze halfpenny, so an easy mistake to make.
Definitely a halfpenny. The easy way to tell is to look at the size of the legend characters in relation to Victoria's bust - on the halfpenny they're proportionately much bigger than on the penny.
-
13 minutes ago, Paddy said:
I can see that the treatment has lightened the tone quite a bit, but I don't see any real verdigris, before or after. Have you tried it on obvious verdigris?
Strange. To my eyes the treated coin is DARKER.
-
On 2/16/2026 at 12:42 AM, wlewisiii said:
I'm new to this game and so the 2025 was my first real book about English coinage. It actually confused me at first when people referred to it as Spink 🤣
Believe me, it was the same in the 90s after Spink took over, but some collectors still referred to it as 'Seaby'!
-
1
-
-
On 2/17/2026 at 3:01 PM, Unwilling Numismatist said:
@Peckris 2 Just to confirm - this is a JH 6d? It almost looks like JH 1+B but there isn't enough in the images to be sure it isn't YH to add confusion.
Hi, yes - it's the JH replacement (second) type.
-
1
-
-
They're unquestionably different. The rare coin you bought has noticeably more wear, which you can see clearly on Britannia's robes.
-
Three questions:
1. where do you get sodium sesquicarbonate from?
2. Presumably filtered water (Brita) counts as chlorine-free?
3. dabbing with a soft towel would do instead of acetone to remove water?
-
On 2/12/2026 at 12:18 AM, Rob said:
You can also get this year's Standard Catalogue of British Coins, otherwise known as Coins of England (COE) 2026, the title now owned by Sovereign Rarities, but before that Spink and before that Seaby's to avoid confusion down the line.
OMG, I didn't know that. When did it stop being Spink?
-
It's possible they were hoarded for silver value, but if that was the only reason you'd expect the majority to be George V 1911-1919. I don't know when your grandad was getting these, but certainly in the 1920s (when silver hoarders were rife) actual coin collectors didn't rate George V (or even Edward VII) as collectable, as they were 'too modern'. There seems to be a strong element of that here.
( <--- irony : "Coin Hoarder"
)
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Ukstu said:
There used to be someone on here year's ago who collected it but i forget his name. Think he was a Dr.
Dr Larry of 'lions and lambs' fame?
-
1
-
-
I can't make much sense of what I can see. However it looks fascinating, good luck finding out more about it!
-
1
-
-
do you have pictures of the other side?
-
Oh yes, I see it. That's a classic die crack/flaw.
-
1
-
1 Shilling - George II Young bust 1739
in Free for all
Posted
I would say Poor/NF
The reason it's so worn is that no silver was struck for currency between 1758 and 1816 (you can forget rarities like the Northumberland shilling, and the 1787 shillings and sixpences were special issues for certain banks customers which is why so many exist in high grade as they mostly didn't circulate). So the poor old George II shillings got so much use before 1816 that it's no wonder they got worn!