Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Peckris 2

Coin Hoarder
  • Posts

    3,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    162

Posts posted by Peckris 2

  1. 8 hours ago, The Bee said:

    Many thanks Dave,

    I can see in David Groom's book (Identification of British C20th Bronze Coin Varieties)there are 8 minor varieties of 1900 listed. Glad to hear that an additional minor variety has been recorded. I wonder is there any source with pictures of the 9 or whether anyone has collected all 9 ?

    Best Regards  

    @DaveG38 *is* David Groom!

    • Like 2
  2. What a shame - I've ordered an Annulet from Peeter Nichols, who are now closing down. I would have been interested in another Mascle (still waiting for the Annulet...)

  3. 3 hours ago, dmw2602 said:

    Hi all, 

    As I can't seem to post pics anymore, I've posted a link to a coin I was hoping one or two of you might have an opinion on. I haven't seen corrosion like this on pennies of this grade, and I was wondering if anyone knew what it was. I appreciate that there is no financial value in it, but I've been looking for one where the die crack looks like thunder hitting the water for a while (don't ask). 

    Are you talking about Britannia's leg? The pictures are pretty poor, but I can't see this as corrosion - depending upon whether it's incuse or raised (the jury's out...) then it's either a planchet flaw causing delamination, or perhaps something like grease finding  its way onto the die.

    • Like 1
  4. My understanding of the term "VIP proof" is that it doesn't refer to a characteristicallly different method of striking, but that they are normal proofs produced in very limited quantities for VIP visitors in years when proofs weren't otherwise issued. Therefore there aren’t any VIP proofs for e.g. 1950 1951 1953, but would exist if struck in 1948 1949 1952 or 1954.

    • Like 1
  5. you've posted in Hammered which I usually mark as “read” as I have no interest in them - could you please check the forum before you post? Many thanks. (These belong in Non-British coins).

    Having said that, those two examples are in a very collectable condition.

    • Thanks 1
  6. You identified my JH 6d as a pattern, I remember! I'll try and post a picture after I've posted without, just to see if I still get 'Forbidden'...

     

    (No, I didn't get 'Forbidden', just "This comment can no longer be edited.." even though it was straight after posting the above comment - and I bet I'm allowed THIS edit even though it's after the picture attempt) 

  7. On 6/11/2025 at 8:21 AM, The Bee said:

    Hi Richard, I saw it - don't know what it went for . I had a couple of my typical "low" bids on at Noonan's, but I don't think I won anything.

    Very Best Regards 

    Their estimates are absurd. For most coins, the hammer price is on average double the top estimate.

    • Like 1
  8. 7 hours ago, Citizen H said:

    Victoria Six pence...1893,

    if correct.....apparently only had a Mintage of 1 300 of this date... Awesome!

    P1180745.JPG

     

    Actually,  it’s the Jubilee Head issue for 1893 that's very rare - the Old Head which you have is the normal (not rare) issue.

    But the 1821 is a very nice example.

    • Thanks 1
  9. On 5/27/2025 at 9:59 AM, terrysoldpennies said:

    Maybe that's why they changed from the F174 with It's uneven pressing between the two sides to the F177.  They were trying to eliminate the ghosting at this time , and its possibly premature ware affecting the reverse side on early types caused by the week low rim that brought about the change. ?

    Yes - the Edward obverse was flatter and didn't cause ghosting to the same extent; but the savage ghosting on 1911 and 1912 reverses must have caused them to redesign.

  10. I've bought silver that was so shiny that some dealers avoided it like the plague. However, I have a nearly infallible way to tell : if the shine is in the fields and between the legend, but not on the design or legend, then I judge it’s natural; it would be virtually impossible to clean only the parts that exclude all the raised elements. As to how they survive in that condition, I wouldn't like to speculate.

    • Like 2
  11. 1 hour ago, The Bee said:

    Many thanks again Richard for confirming it was ja and if the photos are helpful, please do use them. It came with what I believe is an 1875 Gouby Lk (so normal penny variety for 1875) in the same condition.

    Very Best Regards 

    It’s very definitely Reverse ja, else it would be Reverse nein.

    • Haha 3
×
×
  • Create New...
Test