More Pennies

[SilverAge3 50]

1860 rev pic 1

[SilverAge3 50]

1860 Obv pic 2

[SilverAge3 50]

1860 rev pic 2

 

So as I said, I'm wondering if what I have is F- 6+D, or if I'm totally off, and also potentially what Gouby would call this.  Thanks again.

Edited March 25 by SilverAge3

[martinross44 6]

2+D IMO. No LCWyon on Obv 6.

https://headsntails14.wordpress.com/victoria-bronze-obverses/ is a great resource

Edited March 25 by martinross44

[SilverAge3 50]

1 minute ago, martinross44 said:

4+D. No LCWyon on Obv 6.

https://headsntails14.wordpress.com/victoria-bronze-obverses/ is a great resource

Oh yeah, mine has initials. Thank you.

[PWA 1967 1,841]

Looks like F13 3+D to me .

 

[terrysoldpennies 691]

Yes its a  3+D  ,

[secret santa 2,013]

Obverse 3 - 138 border teeth

[martinross44 6]

I stand corrected

[SilverAge3 50]

Thanks everyone.

[terrysoldpennies 691]

I picked this one up recently , A stunning piece as you can see 😂.I wish . But , its an F21  3+d 1861 and on Richards rare list

I payed sixteen pounds for it in a terrible state .   Both pictures below and after a clean up

 

[terrysoldpennies 691]

[terrysoldpennies 691]

[PWA 1967 1,841]

A new purchase 1858 Bramah 26a , First I in Britanniar has no serrifs.

Like most copper varieties scarce in high grade.

 

 

[SilverAge3 50]

Very nice, PWA.

[PWA 1967 1,841]

A new purchase Gouby BP1880Af and a reasonable grade for type.