1687 Crown Query

[Paulus 1,942]

Spink lists no varieties for the 1687, but does anyone think there is something 'going on' with the '8' here? I know there is often something 'going on' with early milled, but I thought I would ask, perhaps a known variety not listed in Spink?

I am rubbish at imagining what other number may or may not be involved!

I would have this reverse at GF, any other opinions?

[Rob 3,000]

I think you are imagining things. The 8s on the early milled are usually asymmetrical. This one is slightly worse than usual, but in the absence of an identifiable under-character I suggest it is a badly formed 8.

Edited April 18, 2014 by Rob

[Paulus 1,942]

I think you are imaginging things. The 8s on the early milled are usually asymmetrical. This one is slightly worse than usual, but in the absence of an identifiable under-character I suggest it is a badly formed 8.

Thanks, I'm sure you are right Rob

[Peter 615]

Looks a pleasing coin.

All to often the date is worn flat.

[Peckris 579]

I'm not sure I can see any other digit there either.

I would rate it as F personally - the centre is almost worn flat.