Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

brg5658

Let's See Your Copper Coins, Tokens, Or Medals!

Recommended Posts

I'm particularly partial to the tone of this 1868 proof penny in copper:

Penny1868%20F58A%206%20+%20G%20OBV%20500Penny1868%20F58A%206%20+%20G%20REV%20500

I LOVE IT! I look at your coin cabinet quite often and love that to. Keep up the good work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the more reason to learn how to photograph your coins instead of "scanning" them. ;) Scanning coins is good for documentation/insurance purposes, but doesn't show most coins in their true form.

It depends on what kind of scanner you prefer to use and on the photoshop version of course.

Usually I scan in all my coins...

0384.jpg

10Lepta1882A_zpse1c36c18.jpg

just try that one: CCD technology scanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some very nice copper medals i havn't photographed yet.

1012331.jpg

1012332.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

got these 2 in Japan, coins are chinese on a string with a piece of paper on the bottom, coin dates seem to vary, dunno what the thing is but these are the old ones

1019750.jpg

1111-18

1019751.jpg

1102-6

dunno why they were on it, there was an 18th century coin on the same thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1012917.jpg

Northern Song, Emperor Shen Zong, Xi Ning Yuan Bao, seal script, 1068-77

968048.jpg

this from the same period as the larger cash above

couple of other early cash i picked up here in britain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the more reason to learn how to photograph your coins instead of "scanning" them. ;) Scanning coins is good for documentation/insurance purposes, but doesn't show most coins in their true form.

It depends on what kind of scanner you prefer to use and on the photoshop version of course.

Usually I scan in all my coins...

0384.jpg

10Lepta1882A_zpse1c36c18.jpg

just try that one: CCD technology scanners
ChKy, are these exceptional examples of your scanner's capability, or are they representational? The images here are excellent for a scanner, what kind of resolution do you get? Did you resize the images here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ChKy, are these exceptional examples of your scanner's capability, or are they representational? The images here are excellent for a scanner, what kind of resolution do you get? Did you resize the images here?

That results are more or less standard. Here are other examples:

Bayern-3Mark-1911D_zpse6726a6e.jpg

10g-Degussa.jpg

I have to admit, that scanning of copper coins is a big task! Feel free to contact me via PM regarding the scanner, resolution ect :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit, that scanning of copper coins is a big task!

Cameo proof - a nice image, but nothing like the view in hand. The best my scanner can do

Km22Cents1965proof.jpg

Edited by davidrj

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit, that scanning of copper coins is a big task!

Uneven (woody) toning is problematic too

Ru28681340Reis1875.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ChKy, are these exceptional examples of your scanner's capability, or are they representational? The images here are excellent for a scanner, what kind of resolution do you get? Did you resize the images here?

That results are more or less standard. Here are other examples:

Bayern-3Mark-1911D_zpse6726a6e.jpg

10g-Degussa.jpg

I have to admit, that scanning of copper coins is a big task! Feel free to contact me via PM regarding the scanner, resolution ect :)

Never mind PM - I think this information would be valuable to all of us. Ok, what scanner and Photoshop settings do you use? (I use an old Canon N670U at full 1200 dpi resolution, and Photoshop CS2, but I seem to not get very good scans out of that combination :( )

Edited by Peckris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind PM - I think this information would be valuable to all of us. Ok, what scanner and Photoshop settings do you use? (I use an old Canon N670U at full 1200 dpi resolution, and Photoshop CS2, but I seem to not get very good scans out of that combination :( )

Agreed! I use an Epson DX4400 Scanner/printer at 2400 dpi, Photoscape 3.6.5 for round cropping and rotation, plus Photoshop CS 8.0 for final presentation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

scanning in Cameo proofs is satisfying because of sufficient contrast between the mirror and mate areas of the coin surface...

proof with pure mirror finish are quite difficult.

Tried to post more pics, but I got the message that I am not allowed to post more pictures in that community...

I will look that up today in the evening and post that afterwards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

025Penny1937_zpsf204bbd8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

025Penny1937PP_zps1176eb61.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it works again... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

scanning in Cameo proofs is satisfying because of sufficient contrast between the mirror and mate areas of the coin surface...

proof with pure mirror finish are quite difficult.

Yes, the few I have all look so dreadful, I wouldn't want to share :(

Old hammered copper is much easier :rolleyes:

8maravedis1600withlaterrevaluationat8m.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find the scanner much better for proofs than currency which are invariably featureless with a monotonous tone. However, it also appears to differ between scanners. The images below were taken using my old scanner which subsequently died, but I can't replicate this with the replacement which gives really flat and lifeless images. This is an image of a proof/specimen depending on whether you back Freeman or not.

img041.jpg

Edited by Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a regular currency strike of the same type.

img043.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still prefer a camera for imaging any type of coin. A scanner offers you no variables - it either takes a decent image or it doesn't, whereas with a camera it's just a case of experimentation with lighting, setup etc to arrive at an acceptable image.

1937 proof farthing:

FT1937P_zps5dccaa3e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still prefer a camera for imaging any type of coin. A scanner offers you no variables - it either takes a decent image or it doesn't, whereas with a camera it's just a case of experimentation with lighting, setup etc to arrive at an acceptable image.

That is the kind of uncertainty I want to avoid. I need reproducable and stable results under constantly the same conditions in order to have the possibility to compare.

The easiest and cheapest way to achieve that is a scanner ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, this is a camera image of the second coin. http://www.rpcoins.co.uk/c15%20pics/01857.jpg

Now that's a case where I prefer the scan!

I still prefer a camera for imaging any type of coin. A scanner offers you no variables - it either takes a decent image or it doesn't, whereas with a camera it's just a case of experimentation with lighting, setup etc to arrive at an acceptable image.

1937 proof farthing:

FT1937P_zps5dccaa3e.jpg

That's tonally very nice, but you've got blown highlights below the parting and on the forehead, and on the wren's back. That could be avoided by underexposing, then bring up the shadow details. Even so, one advantage of scans is that the 'flatness' of tone also gives evenness of detail which can be lacking on a photo.

I suppose the bottom line is that scans bring out that predictable evenness of detail you want to show up, where a photo gives the beauty of tone often at the expense of that evenness. You pays your money...

Edited by Peckris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, this is a camera image of the second coin. http://www.rpcoins.co.uk/c15%20pics/01857.jpg

That's tonally very nice, but you've got blown highlights below the parting and on the forehead, and on the wren's back. That could be avoided by underexposing, then bring up the shadow details. Even so, one advantage of scans is that the 'flatness' of tone also gives evenness of detail which can be lacking on a photo.

I suppose the bottom line is that scans bring out that predictable evenness of detail you want to show up, where a photo gives the beauty of tone often at the expense of that evenness. You pays your money...

There are some blown highlights, but that's easily fixed with a change to the camera exposure settings, or a diffuser between light and subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still prefer a camera for imaging any type of coin. A scanner offers you no variables - it either takes a decent image or it doesn't, whereas with a camera it's just a case of experimentation with lighting, setup etc to arrive at an acceptable image.

That is the kind of uncertainty I want to avoid. I need reproducable and stable results under constantly the same conditions in order to have the possibility to compare.

The easiest and cheapest way to achieve that is a scanner ;)

I only had to find a setup that I like once. I now use the same setup for all coin images and therefore have reproducible and comparable results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×