Coins 728x90

50 Years of RotographicRotographic.com Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Rotographic on Facebook for offers and updates.

Rotographic on Facebook

Collectors' Coins Great Britain 2015 C Coins - Decimal Issues of the UK Standard Guide to Grading British Coins Arabic Coins & How to Read ThemEngland's Striking History Roman Base Metal Coins - A Price Guide Roman Silver Coins - A Price Guide  Available for Kindle Available as .epub

Some of the current Rotographic books on Amazon. Click the Kindle icon above to see the Rotographic range for Kindle. Click the .epub icon to purchase as .epub direct from Rotographic.

50 Years of RotographicPredecimal.com. British Numismatic Trade Association Member - One of the most popular websites on British coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

azda

Your thoughts on this please

23 posts in this topic

Was taking a few pictures of some coins. When i was cropping etc came across this, what looks like O for C in CAROLVS 1st picture is the normal C 2nd is the possible O

P1090017.jpg

P1090021.jpg

Edited by azda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coins 728x90

Was taking a few pictures of some coins. When i was cropping etc came across this, what looks like O for C in CAROLVS 1st picture is the normal C 2nd is the possible O

Looks like it to me, nice catch Azda

Edited by Gollum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was taking a few pictures of some coins. When i was cropping etc came across this, what looks like O for C in CAROLVS 1st picture is the normal C 2nd is the possible O

Looks like it to me, nice catch Azda

Looks like a damaged C to me. If you look at the O it thins top and bottom whereas the broken C only thins were the gap between the upper and lower jaws should be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang in there Dave

That looks like a corker.

Love it. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it, it looks a clear error. I'm not sure how a damaged C could put extra metal into the mix?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was taking a few pictures of some coins. When i was cropping etc came across this, what looks like O for C in CAROLVS 1st picture is the normal C 2nd is the possible O

Looks like it to me, nice catch Azda

Looks like a damaged C to me. If you look at the O it thins top and bottom whereas the broken C only thins were the gap between the upper and lower jaws should be.

I agree it certainly looks like a die flaw/crack has extended between the curves of the C to form an "O" shape. This is based on the assumption that the style of the O is different.

However having said that it could be argued to be an "O" if you can prove the C on a same denomination without the overstrike is also a different shape which it appears to be on the comparison. Are the photos of two coins that are the same denomination? or are they different denominations from the same maundy set?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was taking a few pictures of some coins. When i was cropping etc came across this, what looks like O for C in CAROLVS 1st picture is the normal C 2nd is the possible O

Looks like it to me, nice catch Azda

Looks like a damaged C to me. If you look at the O it thins top and bottom whereas the broken C only thins were the gap between the upper and lower jaws should be.

I agree it certainly looks like a die flaw/crack has extended between the curves of the C to form an "O" shape. This is based on the assumption that the style of the O is different.

However having said that it could be argued to be an "O" if you can prove the C on a same denomination without the overstrike is also a different shape which it appears to be on the comparison. Are the photos of two coins that are the same denomination? or are they different denominations from the same maundy set?

The possible error is a 3d 1680 the other a 2d 1678. I've scoped the possible error. Sideways O? IE, the fatter sides of a normal O being top and bottom other than left and right (if you get what i mean lol)

post-5057-038092200 1326116142_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was taking a few pictures of some coins. When i was cropping etc came across this, what looks like O for C in CAROLVS 1st picture is the normal C 2nd is the possible O

Looks like it to me, nice catch Azda

Looks like a damaged C to me. If you look at the O it thins top and bottom whereas the broken C only thins were the gap between the upper and lower jaws should be.

From my scoped picture Gary, you can clearly see that it does'nt thin top and bottom, it's clearly fatter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it, it looks a clear error. I'm not sure how a damaged C could put extra metal into the mix?

This was also my thought Peck, how would it add metal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it, it looks a clear error. I'm not sure how a damaged C could put extra metal into the mix?

This was also my thought Peck, how would it add metal?

Something would have to cut into the die at that precise point - seems too much of a coincidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it, it looks a clear error. I'm not sure how a damaged C could put extra metal into the mix?

This was also my thought Peck, how would it add metal?

It wouldn't add metal, it would be incuse on the die. Therefore a die crack that is incuse would result in a raised link between the curves of the C. I agree it could well be a sideways O but you would need to look at the letter styles on a coin of the same denomination to be more certain.

I have seen die cracks in all shapes and sizes and that have made all manner of things look like they have appeared, but you need to be certain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it, it looks a clear error. I'm not sure how a damaged C could put extra metal into the mix?

This was also my thought Peck, how would it add metal?

It wouldn't add metal, it would be incuse on the die. Therefore a die crack that is incuse would result in a raised link between the curves of the C. I agree it could well be a sideways O but you would need to look at the letter styles on a coin of the same denomination to be more certain.

I have seen die cracks in all shapes and sizes and that have made all manner of things look like they have appeared, but you need to be certain.

You need look no further than the O in CAROLVS on the same coin Colin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me it looks like C on O (or perhaps an inverted C). If the error were discovered after the first strike it would probably explain why the line is thin.

Here a similar example of a danish error coin - K over misplaced N in Skilling:

post-6657-081210100 1326131188_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need look no further than the O in CAROLVS on the same coin Colin

Sorry Dave I mean you could do with another 3d so that you can see what a normal C should look like. It may help determine whether it is a rotated C or whether we could discount a C altogether

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think C over inverted or rotated C. The Os are more oval rather than round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think C over inverted or rotated C. The Os are more oval rather than round.

Which would explain no gap in the letter C.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think C over inverted or rotated C. The Os are more oval rather than round.

Which would explain no gap in the letter C.

Quite a blade, that King Oar :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a blade, that King Oar :D

:lol: But he hasn't got an oar, he's Oaralus times 2.

A very interesting coin, Azda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a blade, that King Oar :D

:lol: But he hasn't got an oar, he's Oaralus times 2.

A very interesting coin, Azda.

Sorry, that's total rollocks :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, that's total rollocks

B over R i think :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C over another C rotated about 120 degrees. I had a better one on the site for about 3 years @ £45 without any takers until a year ago. Either no interest or no viewers - take your pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, that's total rollocks

B over R i think :D

:lol:

Bowlocks

Edited by Peckris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bowlocks

so b over r, w over l etc etc etc :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now