Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Coin_Hunter

The curious 1886 Victorian Farthing

Recommended Posts

Regarding the 1886 Farthing I am rather intrigued by this as I have an interest in this genre of coins and was looking in that splendid book "Collectors' Coins GB 2007" for the 1886 Farthing and found that, although the valuation of 'fine' graded copies was only £1 as are a lot of the others from around that time, there was a massive hike in value for coins in the VF, EF etc.. conditions...

Although this could be put down to production figures of this particular coin this is what puzzled me: the figures for production for the year 1886 are actually higher for that particular year being 7,767,790 as against 1.1 to 5.8 million for years in the surrounding area of say 1883 to 1891.

What could the explanation be?!

Is this a book error or could it be the well-known discrepancy between mintage figures for a particular year and numbers of coins dated in a particular year?

Thanks in advance,

perplexedly,

CoinHunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The figures are thought to be correct but are of the number of coins made that year, not the number dated that year. As clarified under 'Mintage Figures' on page 4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh so it was in fact due to there having been many minted in that year but not of the date - that's what conclusion I did draw but I just wanted to clarify this...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×