Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
ozjohn

Coin Reverse Orientation

Recommended Posts

Is there any reason why the RM changed the  orientation of the reverse design on half crowns when the jubilee coins were issued in 1887?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And why were the bronze coins in medal orientation from 1860 as well for that matter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have trouble with this.

It's like someone got things muddled up years ago, and everyone since blindly followed.

 

My problem goes like this:  I realised many many years ago, medals can be lifted, but if you twist them, this will probably damage the pin or the cloth.

So you mount a medal so that if you want to read the back, you lift it up, like an old-fashioned nurse's watch, not try to rip it off the wearer's jacket.

 

I then found out the orientation labelling was the opposite of what made sense....!!!!!!!@

What??    Why?     Medals have a horizontal 'hinge' at the top, intentionally.

If they were to be twisted, they would hang from a single, rotatable point......

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, blakeyboy said:

My problem goes like this:  I realised many many years ago, medals can be lifted, but if you twist them, this will probably damage the pin or the cloth.

So you mount a medal so that if you want to read the back, you lift it up, like an old-fashioned nurse's watch, not try to rip it off the wearer's jacket.

Good question Blake, I had never thought about it.

Perhaps due to the solemn nature of the award, the reverse may be intended to be viewed by the owner and not by a curious bystander.

When he lifts the medal when being worn, the orientation will be good for him and the ribbon provides slack to do so. He turns it inwards instead of outwards.

I also think that using a pivoting mount would result in an occasionally reversed medal on the parade ground.

It would be interesting to know the generally accepted reason.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, blakeyboy said:

I still have trouble with this.

It's like someone got things muddled up years ago, and everyone since blindly followed.

 

My problem goes like this:  I realised many many years ago, medals can be lifted, but if you twist them, this will probably damage the pin or the cloth.

So you mount a medal so that if you want to read the back, you lift it up, like an old-fashioned nurse's watch, not try to rip it off the wearer's jacket.

 

I then found out the orientation labelling was the opposite of what made sense....!!!!!!!@

What??    Why?     Medals have a horizontal 'hinge' at the top, intentionally.

If they were to be twisted, they would hang from a single, rotatable point......

Interesting, would like to learn the reason behind as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still being curious about the change from coin orientation to medal orientation in 1887 I contacted the Royal Mint. Their reply is attached for information. However US coins are still minted in coin orientation and changing it did not seem to help the George V silver issues. As a general observation US coins seem to be deeper struck than UK coins and possibly a benefit in the quality of strike results..

Screenshot 2022-05-14 103738.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting - I would never have guessed that.

Were any of the early bronze patterns medal orientation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ozjohn said:

Still being curious about the change from coin orientation to medal orientation in 1887 I contacted the Royal Mint. Their reply is attached for information. However US coins are still minted in coin orientation and changing it did not seem to help the George V silver issues. As a general observation US coins seem to be deeper struck than UK coins and possibly a benefit in the quality of strike results..

Screenshot 2022-05-14 103738.png

He's not the David Mason of World Coins, Canterbury (now defunct) fame is he?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, ozjohn said:

Still being curious about the change from coin orientation to medal orientation in 1887 I contacted the Royal Mint. Their reply is attached for information. However US coins are still minted in coin orientation and changing it did not seem to help the George V silver issues. As a general observation US coins seem to be deeper struck than UK coins and possibly a benefit in the quality of strike results..

Screenshot 2022-05-14 103738.png

I'd take issue with his reasoning - i.e. the Jubilee Head obverse - as the change to medal orientation had already been done for bronze nearly 30 years earlier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×