Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
1949threepence

What the heck is this coin?

Recommended Posts

We've probably all experienced this scenario. Colleagues know you're a coin collector, so every now and then one will bring you some in to ID and value.

In this case someone brought me an entire tin of coins, all of which were worthless, with the possible exception of this one. I had no idea what it was, as it's outside my speciality, but it looked as though it had potential and I told her so. She asked me to take it away and see if I could positively ID what it was. From brief research at home, it looks like it might be a spade half guinea from 1790, but the obverse just doesn't match pictured specimens at all. So I'm wondering if it's a fake.

The reverse looks a lot better than the obverse.

Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.      

Tracy's coin rev.jpg

Tracy's coin obv.jpg

Edited by 1949threepence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spade guinea fake counter from the victorian period - worth around 50p -£1

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, copper123 said:

Spade guinea fake counter from the victorian period - worth around 50p -£1

Thought as much - thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 1949threepence said:

We've probably all experienced this scenario. Colleagues know you're a coin collector, so every now and then one will bring you some in to ID and value.

In this case someone brought me an entire tin of coins, all of which were worthless, with the possible exception of this one. I had no idea what it was, as it's outside my speciality, but it looked as though it had potential and I told her so. She asked me to take it away and see if I could positively ID what it was. From brief research at home, it looks like it might be a spade half guinea from 1790, but the obverse just doesn't match pictured specimens at all. So I'm wondering if it's a fake.

The reverse looks a lot better than the obverse.

Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.     

Not a fake as such, more likely a gaming counter, though they usually have "impossible" dates on.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Margaret Thatcher would be delighted to see herself on a coin......

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Information from Google.

"George III brass 'spade' guinea card counter. 1790. Rev. C.W.B. & Co. Birm. Neilson 6910.
The standard 'spade' design along with a spurious date is given. The legend reads: .C.W.B.ET.CO.DG./I.REX.F.D.B.I.R.M.1790. This garbled legend actually gives the maker's name, C.W.B & Co. (Charles William Bagnall) and the place of manufacture, 16, Hockley Street, Birmingham."

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Sword said:

Information from Google.

"George III brass 'spade' guinea card counter. 1790. Rev. C.W.B. & Co. Birm. Neilson 6910.
The standard 'spade' design along with a spurious date is given. The legend reads: .C.W.B.ET.CO.DG./I.REX.F.D.B.I.R.M.1790. This garbled legend actually gives the maker's name, C.W.B & Co. (Charles William Bagnall) and the place of manufacture, 16, Hockley Street, Birmingham."

Years ago these were seen as worthless as they are plentyful and have few fans - I have a whole tray I have saved from coin fairs over the years , I bet there are some great stories to be told about many of them .

The main thing missing is a cataloge giving info - I dont think anyone is working on one at the moment - such a pity

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, copper123 said:

Years ago these were seen as worthless as they are plentyful and have few fans - I have a whole tray I have saved from coin fairs over the years , I bet there are some great stories to be told about many of them .

The main thing missing is a cataloge giving info - I dont think anyone is working on one at the moment - such a pity

There already is a catalog ! "A Thousand Guineas" by Nielson and Warburton. 

galata.co.uk/store.asp?storeAction=showDetail&stockID=6523&stockMasterCategoriesID=9

Like the Cumberland Jacks ("To Hanover" tokens), this is a series for people who like micro-varieties and impossible rarities. The vast majority of pieces are common, easily obtainable in top grades, and not very attractive or interesting. Then there are all sorts of fun advertising pieces, and oddities, some of which only very few are known. 

I dabble in the series as it crosses over with my interest in 19th century advertising tokens....

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, JLS said:

There already is a catalog ! "A Thousand Guineas" by Nielson and Warburton. 

galata.co.uk/store.asp?storeAction=showDetail&stockID=6523&stockMasterCategoriesID=9

Like the Cumberland Jacks ("To Hanover" tokens), this is a series for people who like micro-varieties and impossible rarities. The vast majority of pieces are common, easily obtainable in top grades, and not very attractive or interesting. Then there are all sorts of fun advertising pieces, and oddities, some of which only very few are known. 

I dabble in the series as it crosses over with my interest in 19th century advertising tokens....

 

Well I never knew that , there again most galata books tend to be of limited runs and are quite expensive

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/3/2020 at 9:01 PM, 1949threepence said:

Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.      

I noticed that the reverse R.37 of your example is unfortunately not shown, the document may be incomplete. You have the 'Thatcher' obverse O.24 #46 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×