Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Paddy

1902 Farthing without mint toning

Recommended Posts

I picked this up on Saturday as part of a box full of foreign coins. Clearly lacking mint toning, but was this how it left the mint or did someone dip it in something subsequently, do you think?

 

1902 F untoned 1-horz Red.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how the farthings were actually toned in the mint. However, if the "mint toning" can be so easily removed by dipping into something, then I guess there will be more of these around?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Paddy said:

I picked this up on Saturday as part of a box full of foreign coins. Clearly lacking mint toning, but was this how it left the mint or did someone dip it in something subsequently, do you think?

 

1902 F untoned 1-horz Red.jpg

Not like genuine lustre at all - it's been artificially gilded, probably to pass off as a half sov> You can always tell these - the gilding is matt and completely the wromg colour.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd expect these to exist though, despite the spurious nature of the above example. I've seen Old Head Victorian examples. 

See London Coins, 2 March 2014, lot 2293, "Farthings (5) 1879 Large 9, 1879 Small 9 (2), 1901 with traces of lustre, not mint darkened, 1907 with lustre, not mint darkened NEF to GEF". 

As typical with farthing varieties, no-one was particularly interested and it went for £42 + premium. 

M"
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, JLS said:

I'd expect these to exist though, despite the spurious nature of the above example. I've seen Old Head Victorian examples. 

See London Coins, 2 March 2014, lot 2293, "Farthings (5) 1879 Large 9, 1879 Small 9 (2), 1901 with traces of lustre, not mint darkened, 1907 with lustre, not mint darkened NEF to GEF". 

As typical with farthing varieties, no-one was particularly interested and it went for £42 + premium. 

M"

I've seen Edward farthings with "lustre" - the right colour but totally the wrong texture. Almost certainly artificial.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Peckris 2 said:

I've seen Edward farthings with "lustre" - the right colour but totally the wrong texture. Almost certainly artificial.

 

I've never seen an Edward VII farthing with convincing original mint lustre, but I've seen an 1898 and a 1901 which looked kosher. Maybe just good coin doctoring though. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked this one up yesterday. An 1843 half farthing. Rather pleased with it:

20200224-134005.jpg

20200224-134123.jpg

 

1826 farthing:

 

20200224-135715.jpg

20200224-135821.jpg

Edited by Loose change
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/11/2020 at 10:45 PM, JLS said:

I've never seen an Edward VII farthing with convincing original mint lustre, but I've seen an 1898 and a 1901 which looked kosher. Maybe just good coin doctoring though. 

Just looking through the Colin Cooke 'Staines Collection of Farthings' catalogue, which came out just yesterday.  Interestingly there are no Edward VII 'light finish' examples even among this comprehensive collection built up over 30 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/10/2020 at 10:06 PM, Sword said:

I don't know how the farthings were actually toned in the mint. However, if the "mint toning" can be so easily removed by dipping into something, then I guess there will be more of these around?

Could it have just been a type of 'hypo' ?

I can imagine that the GVI toning would be very dark brown if the solutions were stronger, but the farthings really were black.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are my example of a 1907 Farthing the first being mint darkened although mine is probably not the best example. The second pictures is of again a 1907 example that has a bright finish to it. Not the best picture as it looks a lot brighter in hand.

1489949734_1907EdwardVIIFarthingDARKENEDRev400.jpg.bbbc1f24dab5e56c2dbdb58b7e482f46.jpg1104845574_1907EdwardVIIFarthingDARKENEDObv400.jpg.8c7c21f0d85d8cc1d3b9ee0763e223e2.jpg

1195847470_1907EdwardVIIFarthingBrightRev400.jpg.d216c52c333f214f0858411c102f10c3.jpg1499715890_1907EdwardVIIFarthingBrightObv400.jpg.ed6b1e4dce0ef87f6a2f7b2e953f6aa4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yours is definitely a light finish.  It looks from the photo as though it did pass through some mint darkening, just to a much lesser extent.  Good to know what to look out for.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, UPINSMOKE said:

Here are my example of a 1907 Farthing the first being mint darkened although mine is probably not the best example. The second pictures is of again a 1907 example that has a bright finish to it. Not the best picture as it looks a lot brighter in hand.

1489949734_1907EdwardVIIFarthingDARKENEDRev400.jpg.bbbc1f24dab5e56c2dbdb58b7e482f46.jpg1104845574_1907EdwardVIIFarthingDARKENEDObv400.jpg.8c7c21f0d85d8cc1d3b9ee0763e223e2.jpg

1195847470_1907EdwardVIIFarthingBrightRev400.jpg.d216c52c333f214f0858411c102f10c3.jpg1499715890_1907EdwardVIIFarthingBrightObv400.jpg.ed6b1e4dce0ef87f6a2f7b2e953f6aa4.jpg

That second example doesn't look like a normal lustred coin. It looks more like a darkened farthing that's been treated? It certainly doesn't look natural.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/5/2020 at 1:46 PM, Varietalis said:

Just looking through the Colin Cooke 'Staines Collection of Farthings' catalogue, which came out just yesterday.  Interestingly there are no Edward VII 'light finish' examples even among this comprehensive collection built up over 30 years.

Although the 1907 specimen, doesn't actually say "black" against the details. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, 1949threepence said:

Although the 1907 specimen, doesn't actually say "black" against the details. 

Good spot!  Definitely worth a punt for £2.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×