Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
shane carew

F 67 - Specimen?

Recommended Posts

Recently I came across a penny a Freeman 67, which is a rare type (6+H) that looked like it had been struck to a specimen standard. I could not find any reference of this type struck to either proof or specimen standard. Has anyone else come across one they would have thought was too good for a circulation strike? 

obv.jpg

rev.jpg

Edited by shane carew
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, shane carew said:

Recently I came across a penny a Freeman 67, which is a rare type (6+H) that looked like it had been struck to a specimen standard. I could not find any reference of this type struck to either proof or specimen standard. Has anyone else come across one they would have thought was too good for a circulation strike? 

 

 

No, in fact the only specimens/possible proofs known of in the 1874 series, are the Heaton Mint ones (F74). I actually successfully bid for the Copthorne example, in 2016.

Your F67 definitely does have the typical red/blue toning characteristics of a specimen, as well as that thick rim, especially to the obverse, which my F74 has as well. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Santa: Yes I have and the coin had a very sharp rim, but the coin is now slabbed. Also, the picture does not perfectly capture the bluish toning seen the coin.
@1949: The Copthorne coin that you refer to was a lovely 'specimen'. Indeed, the rim is a good indicator but there are no official specimens of this date bar the Heatons as you rightly point out. Further, the F67 is one variety that I've hardly seen about 6 in high grades and at least 2 out of those had a thick rim. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a die break on the top of the reverse ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, 1949threepence said:

No, in fact the only specimens/possible proofs known of in the 1874 series, are the Heaton Mint ones (F74). I actually successfully bid for the Copthorne example, in 2016.

Your F67 definitely does have the typical red/blue toning characteristics of a specimen, as well as that thick rim, especially to the obverse, which my F74 has as well. 

I have an 1862 penny with a wide rim, glossy almost reflective fields, and a sharp strike. I've always written it off as "not a proof" but I'd be open to it being a specimen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, shane carew said:

@Santa: Yes I have and the coin had a very sharp rim, but the coin is now slabbed. Also, the picture does not perfectly capture the bluish toning seen the coin.
@1949: The Copthorne coin that you refer to was a lovely 'specimen'. Indeed, the rim is a good indicator but there are no official specimens of this date bar the Heatons as you rightly point out. Further, the F67 is one variety that I've hardly seen about 6 in high grades and at least 2 out of those had a thick rim. 

 

Here's my F67, out of interest. Ordinary rim and definitely not a specimen, but as you say there are other non specimens with a thick rim.

High grade, but definitely a currency strike, and a clear difference to yours, which does have all the hallmarks of a specimen strike. 

 

 

 

 

freeman 67 rev cropped.jpg

freeman 67 obv cropped.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Peckris 2 said:

I have an 1862 penny with a wide rim, glossy almost reflective fields, and a sharp strike. I've always written it off as "not a proof" but I'd be open to it being a specimen.

Pics, Chris?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If some specimen coins have a wide rim, but are struck from the same dies as the later currency strikes, would they not have to have a larger collar in the press, and be measurably wider? Otherwise with a wider rim the die would have to be fractionally smaller for a coin of standard size. Any thoughts?

Jerry

And I agree, the coin in question could easily be a “specimen” from the picture. But can we reliably distinguish these from early currency strikes from ‘proof’ dies, or even ‘new’ normal working dies? Unless the existence of specimens is contemporaneously recorded, how can there be any certainty?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My F67 has fairly wide rims too - or smaller teeth. It is clearly a circulated coin.

Jerry

1874 f67 obv.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jelida said:

If some specimen coins have a wide rim, but are struck from the same dies as the later currency strikes, would they not have to have a larger collar in the press, and be measurably wider? Otherwise with a wider rim the die would have to be fractionally smaller for a coin of standard size. Any thoughts?

Jerry

And I agree, the coin in question could easily be a “specimen” from the picture. But can we reliably distinguish these from early currency strikes from ‘proof’ dies, or even ‘new’ normal working dies? Unless the existence of specimens is contemporaneously recorded, how can there be any certainty?

Good points Jerry. Logically, you're spot on. 

Maybe the wide rim is a bit of an erroneous red herring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP coin looks "specimenish" to me. I like the overall appearance as being proof

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@JLS there are no die breaks on this coin. Considering the Obv 6 and Rev G dies were in use since 1860 with 1874 being their last, I would have expected some die cracks to have made an appearance on the coin struck for currency purposes or for the coin to contain some strike imperfections such as missing detail around the shield or the breastplate. Both these imperfections are almost always present on the 1872 currency penny. 

@Peckris: very interesting, pictures of the coin please? 

@Jelida: "But can we reliably distinguish these from early currency strikes from ‘proof’ dies, or even ‘new’ normal working dies? Unless the existence of specimens is contemporaneously recorded, how can there be any certainty?" Exactly, you capture my predicament accurately. I've come across specimens housed in a special presentation case, as is the case with the 1935 crown, which are quite different to proofs that come housed in a very different type of presentation case. With copper and bronze coins I've seen them housed in presentation cases only when the coins are proof. Would that mean there were no specimen strikes at all with copper and bronze coins? Very unlikely I feel but that alone can't for the basis of a case for base metal specimen strikes. Hence here's me asking on an open forum hoping that someone knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, 1949threepence said:

Pics, Chris?

I'm afraid this is a typical example of a scan obliterating all that's good about a coin's tone. However, it's the best I could do back then, but it doesn't show the penny's glossy dark blue/green patina.

811591980_1862pennyreverse(ii).jpg.c3b860baa210a2e4094e1917552f6a00.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always been a little sceptical about some of the so-called "proofs" and/or "specimens" of the 1874 series. LCA have sold several F74 proof pennies (I have bought one) and although they are sharply struck with good surfaces, I have never been totally convinced that they were struck as proofs. Interestingly, they offered in September 2012 a "unique" 1874 (no H) 6+G penny for sale, ex-Freeman who described it as proof. The accompanying description was interesting as it exemplified the debates around proof/nonproof pennies of that era. The coin was unsold and I don't recall why I didn't buy it - I guess I wasn't convinced.

1815094974_1874Proofdescn-Copy.thumb.jpg.fbc05d3f96c5d8f4a391793f7d46416e.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Peckris 2 said:

I'm afraid this is a typical example of a scan obliterating all that's good about a coin's tone. However, it's the best I could do back then, but it doesn't show the penny's glossy dark blue/green patina.

811591980_1862pennyreverse(ii).jpg.c3b860baa210a2e4094e1917552f6a00.jpg

I can see that the fields are smooth and the strike very sharp.

Are you able to take a picture now?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 1949threepence said:

I can see that the fields are smooth and the strike very sharp.

Are you able to take a picture now?

 

Not really. :( Disability allows me just about to wield an iPad, and my Lumix camera in automatic 'snapshot' mode, but that's about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Peckris 2 said:

Not really. :( Disability allows me just about to wield an iPad, and my Lumix camera in automatic 'snapshot' mode, but that's about it.

Not to worry. Got a pretty good idea from the above anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the F74 is a proof, nor was ever intended to be. Rather it is an intentional specimen, as opposed to an early strike from new polished dies. 

The following description accompanied the Copthorne example:-

Quote

 

86.     1874 Specimen issue. BMC 1698. F 74. Dies 7 + H. Small rim nick at 3 o'clock. Virtually as struck with some lustre.

Ex D. Wallis Collection, DNW Auction 83, 30 September 2009, lot 3372 (from J. Welsh January 2000). Periodically, the Heaton mint struck carefully finished 'specimen' coins of varying denominations as an example of what the company could produce; in some instances they were presented as gifts to dignitaries and government officials and in other cases were part of the travelling portfolio of a Heaton sales representative

(cf. Gunstone, SNC December 1977, p545; cf Tansley Collection, DNW 67, Lot 369 

 

Anyway, here it is. It is an exceptionally good strike, especially to the obverse. But lacks any indication whatever of it being a proof.

 

cropped 1874 obv.jpg

cropped speciment 1874 rev.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×