Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Recommended Posts

what do you guys make of this, real or copy ?   

56907756_411741576329292_6617300419829825536_o.jpg

56526773_411741569662626_3479406843904655360_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks fine to me. 1859, which this is, is not noted for having fakes or repros made of it - 1864 is the usual one.

To be surer, can you get an accurate weight of it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At first sight looks like a fake to me. 

- the ‘t’s in tenth also make me suspicious, not pointed as original.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks ok to me.  The 't's in tenth on some 1859 florins look recut (or otherwise malformed).

D0732-R.jpg

Edited by Nick
Added the word 'some'. Not all 1859 florins exhibit this feature.
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Nick said:

Looks ok to me.  The 't's in tenth on 1859 florins look recut (or otherwise malformed).

D0732-R.jpg

i stand corrected😉

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Diaconis said:

i stand corrected😉

Just edited my previous post.  Not all 1859 florins have this feature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks cleaned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks real rather than fake to my eyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I vote for real deal but cleaned with subsequent oxidation and "cameo" wear. Wish I could post mine, sorry though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly looks genuine to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×