Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Tommy Yang

Strange coin: Carolus IIII 8 Reales 1817?

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I have recently purchased the below Carolus IV 8 Reales coin without looking at its date.

After a closer examination I realised that Carolus IV abdicated in 1808 and the coin says it is minted in 1817??

In my humbled opinion, this coin shows no sign of forgery. Can you guys please let me know if you know anything about it?

If I have posted the coin in the wrong section, I apologise in advance.

IMG_0731.thumb.jpg.8df8b04ccd8428cf03c2310fe87485f5.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not so much a fake perhaps (the date error is too obvious) but possibly an "evasion", i.e. a coin minted with a deliberate wrong date for purposes of trade in certain regions?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a clue about these, but given the abdication date it doesn't sound right. What mint is it? Weight? Edge?

The portrait doesn't seem to match the 1808 coins exactly, but I haven't checked all the different mints. The eyelid is too long for a start and the front cuirasse strap could be a bit too long. Usually the other 3 are slightly longer.

It's almost certain the Chinese will be making these, so anybody know if this is one?

You might be better off posting on a US forum as there are a lot of collectors of 8 Reales over there due to the Hispanic connection with the US. If it is a copy, it won't be the only one.

Edited by Rob
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, thank you for your help. I have consulted a few experienced dealer in China and they believe it is not a Chinese fake. I am trying to attach the back picture but I can't for some reason...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

over 500kB. If not, leave the thread and come back into it, then the 500kb limit per post will reset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reverse looks all wrong - it seems far too crude. The assayer's initials are wrong. There is no F P at Mexico. The latest my edition of Krause gives a P is 1665. In 1817 the assayers were Jose and Joaquin, so a J seems to be imperative.

Unfortunately I don't have an example of a modern copy and only have a genuine 1794 Lima mint to compare, but the pillars in particular on your coin seem to be lacking in quality. I suppose it is possible it is a contemporary copy made during the Civil War around 1821, but it certainly isn't an official product. That is why I suggested asking across the pond.

 

034 - Copy (2).JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×