Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Sylvester

Victorian die number question

Recommended Posts

I've wondered this before but never got around to asking.

Let's say there are two sovereigns, an 1868 and an 1869 and they both have the same die number, lets pick 21.

Now as you are no doubt aware on sovereigns the die number is on the undated side of the coin. Are these two different No. 21 dies, or could it plausibly be one die that was used over two years?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds like a question for the Royal Mint, as on the face of it, both are possible. 

Do we know of any overdates with the same die & number? This would shed a light on whether the die number was exclusive to the die and not the year, but does rely on the die being flawed to confirm its reuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not aware of any die numbers being used more than once.  Having said that, human error must mean that a die number was mistakenly reused at some point.

My understanding is that the die number is unique to the die, so where the date is on the obverse - it must be possible to have the same die number on different year coins, especially as the obverse dies did not last as long as the reverse dies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's kind of what I thought too...

But then you look at reported die numbers for sovereigns, eg. die number 1 was used in the following years: 1863, 1865, 1866, 1868, 1870, 1871, 1873

Two consecutive years maybe, but over 7 years? Isn't that stretching it a little?

The silver coinage is of course a lot easier in that the die number and the dates are on the same sides and so it's clear that barring an overdate, they are in fact different dies. Maybe dies produced by the same die cutter though? Quality control for each of the mint's employees?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sylvester said:

I've wondered this before but never got around to asking.

Let's say there are two sovereigns, an 1868 and an 1869 and they both have the same die number, lets pick 21.

Now as you are no doubt aware on sovereigns the die number is on the undated side of the coin. Are these two different No. 21 dies, or could it plausibly be one die that was used over two years?

 

As Rob says, both are possible.

In successive years, I'd say the same die was more probable than not. But if the same die No was used 10 years apart, it's unlikely to be the same actual die. 

 

Edited by 1949threepence
talking rubbish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possible but unlikely I would think? I assume that die numbers were used sequentially and dies would either have been used until unusable or destroyed.

Not to say that a numbered die didn't fall behind the couch at some point or other and get refound though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×