Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

terrysoldpennies

Recessed ear 1915/16 penny

Recommended Posts

Last week I picked up a decent 1915 Recessed ear penny [ show on the next post] . That got me thinking about the life of this die, from its start to its destruction, and so I hunted around and managed to find an 1916 example with a die crack running right across the coin from the A in GRA to the D in DEF on the other side of the coin.  The crack is so bad that it must have meant the end of the die, and the production of this type.   Pic. On the left starting at the top is an early 1915 strike without the crack , but note the tooth in question seems smaller than the others ?.    Next down is also a 1915 and appears to have a small curved bite out of the bottom of the tooth .     Third down is a 1916, it has now developed, and a large section is missing from the tooth.    Finally the bottom insert also 1916 shows the final extent of the tooth loss, as this is the example with the die crack, also shown in full on the right side.  

1915-16 recessed ear sequence begining to end of die life.JPG 

Edited by terrysoldpennies
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s nice Terry,  and confirmation that it is a single die variety.

Jerry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So does anyone have a 1915 RE without a chipped tooth?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 1915 RE has the chipped tooth, though it is only just noticeable if you know what to look for.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, I'm not so sure about the single die theory. My 1915 has a very severely damaged tooth (see below) which is only present on the 1916s above. 

1915 RE penny obv.jpg

 

 

The real question is - since the amended obverse worked to eliminate the flattening of Britannia even on BU examples of the unamended obverse - why didn't they persist with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Peckris said:

Hmm, I'm not so sure about the single die theory. My 1915 has a very severely damaged tooth (see below) which is only present on the 1916s above. 

1915 RE penny obv.jpg

 

 

The real question is - since the amended obverse worked to eliminate the flattening of Britannia even on BU examples of the unamended obverse - why didn't they persist with it?

It could be a late ‘15, the question is whether the damaged tooth progresses chronologically; are there any relatively undamaged tooth RE 1916’s? It is unlikely that several distinct working dies identically broke teeth, so a multiple die usage would necessitate a damaged master die or a deliberate use of the damaged tooth as a marker for the new obverse. More research required . Perhaps as we use the broken tooth as an identifier, we are missing undamaged tooth coins.

Jerry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I would think thats definately right Jerry.The same die starting late1915 (you dont see as many) and getting worse right upto the die crack on 1916.All the 1916 recessed ear have a large part of the tooth missing that i have seen and a progression of the 1915.Also a lot of the 1916 are seen in high grade which may be down to being the first  struck  for the year and more were put away or kept .Terrys pictures show this well and dont feel it would of been deliberate ,just it broke and they continued to use the recessed ear untill going back to the normal OBV after the die crack.I am only guessing and suppose the only way is to be sure there was only one OBV die with the recessed ear.

Pete.

Edited by PWA 1967
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you say one or both of these is recessed ear, I am having a hard time telling, I know one is but not sure on the other. One has a broken tooth but to me under an eye glass both ears look similar. 

115A.jpg

115B.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My RE Although to look at you would think this must of been an early strike as it resembles the 1915 more with just a bite out of the tooth?

1916MS64BNOBVRE.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bearing in mind that what we refer to as a broken tooth, is the result of a partial blockage of one of the tiny indentations around the edge of the die that form the teeth. its not unlikely that the hole started to block during 1915 then gradually built up, but during this period a small piece of the blockage may have broken away again, only to them build up again giving the variation in the size of the tooth, this may explain the out of sequence 1915 coin of Zoos :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, terrysoldpennies said:

Bearing in mind that what we refer to as a broken tooth, is the result of a partial blockage of one of the tiny indentations around the edge of the die that form the teeth. its not unlikely that the hole started to block during 1915 then gradually built up, but during this period a small piece of the blockage may have broken away again, only to them build up again giving the variation in the size of the tooth, this may explain the out of sequence 1915 coin of Zoos :D

The one zoo has is 1916 Terry,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes your right Pete, but the same principal applies , It seems unlikely that a test die would be given a broken tooth for recognition, as at around this time increasing or decreasing the number of teeth was used, as with the 1908 164a  and the 1911 hollow neck .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i dont believe its broken for a test that is why you find them without the broken tooth and think from memory davidrj posted one on another thread.Although i dont think there are many without part of the tooth missing and i have never been able to convince myself without the tooth indicator.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, PWA 1967 said:

Yes i dont believe its broken for a test that is why you find them without the broken tooth and think from memory davidrj posted one on another thread.Although i dont think there are many without part of the tooth missing and i have never been able to convince myself without the tooth indicator.

A case of Pavlov's Clogs?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's with unworn coins, I have a couple that are worn, and its very obvious as the ear is totally untouched  with the rest of the head badly worn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, terrysoldpennies said:

Bearing in mind that what we refer to as a broken tooth, is the result of a partial blockage of one of the tiny indentations around the edge of the die that form the teeth. its not unlikely that the hole started to block during 1915 then gradually built up, but during this period a small piece of the blockage may have broken away again, only to them build up again giving the variation in the size of the tooth, this may explain the out of sequence 1915 coin of Zoos :D

Sorry Terry I should of Put mine is a 1916 RE that resembles the tooth structure of the 1915 my bad :)
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes probably Rob its more the picture rather than having one in hand.Have you had any or seen any with the tooth complete or do you not bother checking them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, PWA 1967 said:

Yes i dont believe its broken for a test that is why you find them without the broken tooth and think from memory davidrj posted one on another thread.Although i dont think there are many without part of the tooth missing and i have never been able to convince myself without the tooth indicator.

Yes I have also seen other dates that resemble RE to look at but never pushed on further mainly because if there were any we would of known by now.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PWA 1967 said:

Yes probably Rob its more the picture rather than having one in hand.Have you had any or seen any with the tooth complete or do you not bother checking them.

I don't bother. I check for open 3s, 1908 1*, narrow date 1877 and 1879, halfpenny numeral 1862s and die numbers. O/w, they are given a cursory glance to see if anything is abnormal. If not, the grade determines whether they are worth putting in the trays or the scrap pile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, zookeeperz said:

Yes I have also seen other dates that resemble RE to look at but never pushed on further mainly because if there were any we would of known by now.?

No i only meant 1915 Zoo ,dont start me off looking at them all :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, PWA 1967 said:

I dont think the top one is Ian.

Yes Pete, the bottom one is a RE complete with broken tooth. The top one does not have a broken tooth but under an eye glass it look the same. I was comparing the hollow section behind the ear and under the ear lobe which is there on both, the top one being more worn. I also compared these two to a 3rd 1915 I have which is definitely not RE and there is a noticeable difference.

Wishful thinking on my part no doubt:ph34r:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you chaps posted this in Hammered just to show off how many posts you can generate in one thread? :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×