Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Conor44

Circular scratches on Early Milled shilling

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

https://postimg.org/image/42brl18it/

This is a coin that has been in my collection for a little over a year now, and I have been puzzled about these circular scratches on this rather nice William and Mary Shilling. They are perfect and get bigger the closer they are to the rim- its the same on the reverse. I originally thought it may be some sort of a mint error, but I am doubtful about this, as on the ebay listing (Calm down, don't worry, a well known BNTA dealer- youll probobally know who from the style of listing photograph) the scratches, although apparent in the photo, were not described at all, although the coin was incorrectly sold to me as an 'unrecorded 3 over 0' type (its 1693), which I cannot see- im not accusing the seller of foul play but it seems to me as he was trying to nab a few more quid for it, possibly to make up for the scratches? Anyway id appreciate if anyone could tell me what they are and do they affect its value? One more point to note: they weren't made yesterday as its apparent that these are old scratches,

Thanks,

Conor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not easy to tell without a much better close up but, are these marks actual circles or a concentric spiral?

If it's a spiral, the marks could be the product of a "reducing machine", an early piece of high tech that was used to make smaller copies of medals and coins for the "commemorative" market. Sometimes also called a Reducing Pantograph.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could we see the reverse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there any marks on the edge that might indicate that it had been gripped by something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are individual concentric circles. I will post bigger images of front and back when I get home later on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, these massively affect the value of the coin. Massively!

Also, in all honesty, if I'd been selling this coin, I don't think I would've thought it necessary to mention such a glaring issue in the description?

Can we have a close up of the overdate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Coinery said:

A bit of further reading for you! :)

 

I'm personally not convinced about this overdate at all, though it'll be interesting to see your's, C44.

The fact the feature appears on different dies weakens the argument a bit. The inverted 2 idea was interesting, excepting the even greater unlikelihood that an inverted 2 would've been mistakenly punched into multiple dies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been having a think about the concentric circles and unless there are some marks on the edge that might indicate that it was held in a vice or chuck so that the

circles could be accidentally or intentionally cut into the metal for some reason, then its possible that they were put there due to the coin being squashed between something with these marks on which was transferred onto the coin through pressure. It could be that the coin just happened to be the right thickness to be used as a spacer for something that had a little bit of weight on it. 

Anyway just a guess on my part.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without overwhelming other evidence, I'd also say no, though it appears to be the same 'error' that's being reported as that overdate.

It's my thought that the 3 might have curled around much more on the freshly made die, but over a short period has become clogged and damaged, maybe even rusty (the general state of the dies shown are pretty poor overall). Then at some point a repair happened, quite possibly using the punch that makes up the tail of the 6 and 9 (could challenge the 9/0 variety too, if the original 6 and 9 weren't composite, but repaired with a new punch?), which was used to create a slightly different and lower line, which may have been intentional to make for a clearer looking 3?

Clear as mud I know! More likely a recut in my opinion. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying that you think that the circles are from the dies when the coin was stamped?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I'm only talking about the overdate proposal. I personally think the circles are post mint damage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked the rim and there's no indication of anything having gripped the coin. Also do you think the circles affect its value ?

C44

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Conor44 said:

Just checked the rim and there's no indication of anything having gripped the coin. Also do you think the circles affect its value ?

C44

 

19 hours ago, Coinery said:

Yes, these massively affect the value of the coin. Massively!

You must have missed this earlier.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only you can decide on whether you like it and didn't over pay.Personally I couldn't ever want it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×