Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
ozjohn

MS 64?

Recommended Posts

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1929-HALFCROWN-NGC-MS64-PLUS-HIGHEST-GRADE-POP-1-0-GREAT-BRITAIN-/182008992738?hash=item2a6094d3e2:g:70UAAOSwa-dWoSSM

How does a coin like this be graded at MS64 ? The reverse is not bad as far as you can see from the out of focus photograph but the obverse leaves a lot to be desired. Some wear on the earlobe several digs all over the sovereign's effigy especially on the beard, nose, neck and forehead also general scuffs in the field. The price of GBP 100 is also on the heavy side for an UNC 1929 halfcrown. Just goes to show buy the coin not the NGC etc. grading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few too many bagmarks for my liking. The price is irrelevant as nobody is compelled to buy and should anyone want one, it would not be too difficult to find another in similar condition for half the price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good God no, what does MS 64+ mean anyway, 64.5?? Look at the wear to the ear, moustache, beard, on the in-focus pic ... more like NEF on the obv from that pic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair to the seller I just had an upgrade off him graded as NGC MS63 for an extremely good price:

1935-hc-2.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not blaming the seller at all, certainly questioning the TPG grading! (and the price for yours was just silly! :) )

Edited by Paulus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh for sure Paul, I should have said I agree with ozjohn :) As we discussed around that 1925 Halfcrown NGC grading seems to be off at times!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they may have gotten carried away by the reverse - from the in-slab and slightly less closeup photo it looks to have very nice lustre of a type sometimes known as "hard lustre". I really don't see wear on the obverse as much as bagmarking and a bit of softer strike in the usual areas. I think I could see it as a 63 if that self-same lustre is as good as it hints at.

My understanding of the "plus" grade is that it is mainly based on aesthetics like lustre, and strike (which this seems IMO not to have).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

64 very generous indeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/11/2016 at 11:59 PM, Rob said:

A few too many bagmarks for my liking. The price is irrelevant as nobody is compelled to buy and should anyone want one, it would not be too difficult to find another in similar condition for half the price.

I have to agree here. I've noticed a few 'higher grade' coins looking very expensive on ebay. 

Buyers can always message the seller and make an offer. Being polite, respectful and giving reasons why your offer is what it is can only help. If they're unhappy with an offer they can just say no etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't look MS64 but difficult to judge from the photos. Even after a few years of handling slabbed coins its still a lottery when grading what they will come out as. Not a particularly rare coin and not to sure why someone would submit it for grading. Would cost around £25 to grade and with this type unless it was MS66 - 67 its not really going to add value

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two comments.

1)  I'm not defending NGC, but it's hard to make any good judgment call of the grade from pictures like that. I will say that MS64 isn't exactly a glowing endorsement of the coin.  It is certainly UNC, and MS63/64 are the most commonly assigned grades to UNC coins with no large or obtrusive gashes, rim dings, bag marks, etc.  You may also note that in the USA grading system, a full/strong strike is not a requirement at grades below MS65.  This is philosophically counter to the way that UK collectors grade UNC coins.  From what I can see in the pictures, I don't see anything that would necessarily bring this coin to below the MS63/64 range.  Lastly, NGC is an opinion -- nobody says you have to like it.

2)  The price is irrelevant, as it is an asking price not a sold price.  People can ask whatever they darn well please for their coins.  This one is high by my standards, but it's easy enough for me not to click on the "Buy it Now" button. :) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Third Party Slabbing is an American invention. I find it entertaining, when lets say a Victoria YH Shield sovereign is graded as MS-65 (meaning GEM BU) comes up at Heritage Auctions. Everyone goes gaga, and bidding extends triple estimate....

Same coin, is later offered by Baldwins, described as a GOOD EF/slabbed as a MS-65.....

 

Hammered material is even worst, Edward III Calais Noble, slabbed as MS-64/ now in Kunker auction, they grade it EF(Vorz)

Slabbed coins are very over graded. That is why I get my material from Europe/UK where it is much stricter in grading.

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will just make a few comments here.

First, the grade given by the TPG is what it is and the coin will sell at that grade in the USA.

Second, it is up to each collector/buyer to look at the coin and decide what they are willing to pay based on how the coin looks as well as all the other usual factors. If they are wiling to blindly follow the TPG grade then that is up to them.

Third, Heritage - and a slabbed coin - is not necessarily more expensive than an equivalent raw coin in a European auction. My 1561 slabbed sixpence cost less than half what a very similar coin cost at DNW just a little bit earlier. I regularly buy slabbed coins at Heritage at very good prices. If the bidding gets silly then I don't take part. Same for bidding at DNW or Spink.

Fourth, in Europe, grading is very subjective and differs from one auction house to another. In my experience, 'assigned' grades are not necessarily stricter in Europe than in the USA. That is why it is so important for the collector to form his/her own opinion.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/10/2016 at 6:38 AM, John Kamps said:

Third Party Slabbing is an American invention. I find it entertaining, when lets say a Victoria YH Shield sovereign is graded as MS-65 (meaning GEM BU) comes up at Heritage Auctions. Everyone goes gaga, and bidding extends triple estimate....

Same coin, is later offered by Baldwins, described as a GOOD EF/slabbed as a MS-65.....

 

Hammered material is even worst, Edward III Calais Noble, slabbed as MS-64/ now in Kunker auction, they grade it EF(Vorz)

Slabbed coins are very over graded. That is why I get my material from Europe/UK where it is much stricter in grading.

John

It's not a matter of "stricter" or "looser" -- you're making apples to oranges comparisons.  The US and UK use two completely different grading scales, period.  Of course they don't "map" to one another -- as they were developed independently and have always been different.  :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×