|
The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com |
|
-
Content Count
365 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Posts posted by mick1271
-
-
I have seen that the packaging error on the sets is a spelling mistake .Televison instead of television for the Logie Baird coin .
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, oldcopper said:I notice some of these W.W's, including mine (which is better condition than this, say Fine), have a weakly struck FID: It's very unusual for a Royal Mint 19th century copper coin to have such noticeable weakness in the legend like that.
I had noticed that , but put it down to wear as it has been through the wars a bit.Interesting to know that it is a known anomaly .It was worse than that , but some acetone took the worse of the gunk off .
-
1
-
-
-
-
I didn't know they were issuing one with the 1969 obverse. I bought a Bunc one because of the design and theme . Not the sort of thing I normally go for , but I do hang onto any commemorative coins I get in my change (few and far between nowadays)
-
There is a lot of 1818 fakes .They are good ,but they all have a couple of things in common .A broken garter belt at PENSE and a dink on the forehead . Yours have neither , so looks alright .
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, 1949threepence said:There's a nice one going at the March LCA - link to
Although it's a bit more than fair to fine, so might be more than you're willing to pay.
I saw that one .Yeh ,it is a bit more than I would be willing to pay .There is a low grade one in a mixed lot , but ,I don't fancy bidding on a lot just for one coin that might be lower grade than I would be happy with . I will get them eventually (in a grade and price I am happy with) ,might just take a while .
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, hibernianscribe said:I know nothing about these sort of things , but apart from it being highly overpriced , it also looks like a really poor fake .
-
Looking for a couple to complete my date run. Not looking for anything great .Fair to fine will do .As long as they are not holed , polished or corroded .
-
-
56 minutes ago, mrbadexample said:I saw that one .Put a bid of a couple of quid on it just so I could get a closer look (if I won it) .
-
21 hours ago, Peckris 2 said:The 1970 proofs weren't struck until after D Day and possibly quite a bit after that? It's quite possible that 2 Mints were therefore used, though given the numbers involved I'd have thought that was extremely inefficient. As for the '1968 halfpenny', that used obverse dies from 1956 so maybe they were using old dies in London prior to demonetisation?
I had a 1974 or possibly 75 proof set with a flyer from the mint advertising the 1970 proof set for sale . So they were still selling ,if not minting them a few years later .I am sure I read somewhere that they started minting them after the 1971 proof set was issued , and kept minting them while demand lasted .
-
10 hours ago, Martinminerva said:Absolutely, Mike, in the case of my 4 plus 3. In fact, in lower grade they are easy to spot as the sea wears flatter and obviously crosses the linear circle. Also, the date spacing is intermediate between the narrow and wide date versions of the common, later reverses for 1875.
They are easy to spot , even in poor condition (as long as the exergue and the sea level is visible , it creates an unbroken band straight across the coin) .My one can only be described as very poor but it is easily identifiable .There always seems to be a couple of equally poor condition ones on ebay , when I look to see if I can find an upgrade .
-
That should be a video of a Sparrowhawk with a pigeon , but I don't seem to be able to add it .
-
-
Yes definitely a Kestrel . They used to be extremely common , but I see more Sparrowhawks than Kestrels nowadays .Starting to make a comeback .
-
-
1 hour ago, 1949threepence said:Consistently over £3k.
Shame about the verd as otherwise not in bad shape. Be good to see the obverse.
The obverse was quite good with no verd . cant find the post (FB is a pain nowadays ) ,If I come across it , I will post the obverse up.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, RLC35 said:I just compared it to my example, and I agree, it is a F192A.
Nice little windfall for the owner .Handed down by a relative and didn't have any idea of its value .Some of the coins had notes with them , so her relative did know what it was .
-
just showed up on a FB page .looks right , but whats peoples thoughts ?
-
2
-
-
Seen these on ebay .Looks like the same size of holes .
-
3 hours ago, Lotad said:Thanks JLS, so improper storage might be at fault then. Are coins like these containing copper more prone to this sort of thing? So far the oldest bag of uncirculated 2p has been 1987, and from memory they were all fine.
I've also found some 2p with red spots rather than these kind. I'll see if I can get a photo.
1987 2ps are bronze , but since 1992 ,they have been copper plated steel .This would probably make a difference in the colour of the corrosion (spots) .
-
1
-
-
-
15 minutes ago, secret santa said:There was a Mick Martin who produced a comprehensive study of copper pennies I believe. I'll check.
That might be where I have heard his name from . Something to do with Reading coin club as well .Definitely not me lol.
Various rarer Freeman and Gouby varieties for sale...
in Items For Sale
Posted
There is a few I am missing , but some I have (like the 7 over 7, 2mm and bisecting 8).I will keep an eye on it, and the very least bid it up a bit lol.