PWA 1967

One i bought a few months ago ,however have hit a brick wall trying to attribute as dont know if its been struck with a foreign coin or a token. The penny has been struck twice and due to the year may of been struck by Heaton ,which makes it harder to determin what the other coin or token is. An advertising token has been suggested due to Co. being on the penny a few times but i really dont have a clue.

Thought i would share this 1854 DOT , E of DEI ,as not seen another and really clear in hand.

Yes they are not common inverted though and thats why i assume they did them this way. I believe if i had put this in auction the auctioneer would of listed it as genuine and would of sold for a premium 😀

1826 penny inverted FAKE. Thought i would share this just incase anyone sees one for sale and before they perhaps pay to much for one ,believing it to be genuine. I could not tell looking at one ,no signs of anything to the outside edge or inner rim ,right weight ,size , looks genuine. BUT i had two and found pictures of another ,they are all the same with the same bag marks etc and could easily be passed off as genuine if you are not able to compare with another. Similar to the 1905 Half crowns that were done in the seventies and look real but all the same.

https://live.spink.com/lots/view/4-9RFQ1T/great-britain-george-v-1910-1936-variety-group-of-1913-pennies-f174-obverse-1-reverse-a- I am not sure which one the Rare F176 is 😃

A young visitor in our garden yesterday , dont see many in Manchester especially during the day.

Yes i agree ,i would not buy that as an 1854/3 looking at the picture. All it does is waste everyones time describing them wrong as the majority just get returned. The vendor not paid or the auctioneer left with a coin they then have to try and sell someone else.

A nice 1797 Penny 10 Leaves NGC MS64 ,better lustre than i was able to capture in the picture ,without the normal contact marks.

I think its more likely the Large rose he overpaid for when he bought it , it has been for sale over two years. The same seller has recently added one on his website in fine grade for £100 and the more expensive one maybe he bought attributed and just gave it a go. Some copper pennies sellers have found not attributed and not paid much for them ,its therefore much easier to sell them cheaply. Dealers who buy quite a lot may just take a chance and pay a high price for something considered rare / scarce hoping to sell it and just make a bit ,it doesnt always work.

A couple just back from NGC both really nice in hand , sellers pictures who i bought them off. 1891 MS65 RED 1894 MS65 RB.

Yes i use gloves to photograph mine.

NGC get plenty wrong ,some more so than others. The coin label has now been changed and the coin not mine ,imagine getting this back 😂

1844 Plain tails DFF ,like most copper penny varieties not many about in EF or better. Not the best picture in the plastic 😀

1854/3 with the note from when Michael Freeman sold the coin on eBay ,i have folded the note over as has the original buyers name and address on.

One just back from NGC MS65 and Scarcer year in high grade 1878.