|
The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com |
|
-
Content Count
2,732 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
114
Posts posted by Peckris 2
-
-
4 hours ago, DrLarry said:is there something wrong with the paper back version?
No. But you'd have to ask Rob why he wants the hardback (I suspect it may be for a customer).
-
1 minute ago, 1949threepence said:I think the blue one shown above is the paperback version, which is also readily available on Amazon.
I too have the hardback, bought in 2009, and not for sale
yeah, me too.
didn't know there was a ppb.
-
8 hours ago, Rob said:Has anybody got a spare copy of the hardback version available? Please PM if so.
Ta.
not spare unfortunately. is it now out of print? if so Chris should really amend that ad above.
-
4 hours ago, DrLarry said:you get a reasonable number for the price .. I have to admit I am a bit smitten by toy coins . most of which, since the 1860' s, have been used for some educational use.
Yes, but you can't really class lifesize plastic 20p's as toy coins .. even if they are!!
-
5 hours ago, copper123 said:Add to CDILTF list lol
I'm pretty sure I've worked out what ILTF stands for! But CD ...?
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, 1949threepence said:Hi Bob,
I remember we discussed Carole Towler once before.
Whilst casually looking through some old Coin Monthly magazines, I spotted an article about her in the February 1969 edition, which includes two photos of her - one with her husband. Thought you might possibly be interested.
She looks about 30ish there, so she'd no doubt be in her 80's now. Anyway here is the article, with separate close ups of the the pics:-
Looking not 100% unlike Emma Peel in that picture..
-
1
-
-
On 10/28/2022 at 9:39 PM, seuk said:Quite extraordinary that it circulated long enough for the silver coating to wear off completely yet was still accepted presumably.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, copper123 said:Ian bradey would have had no chance then......
eh?
-
Looks like the dark haired girl is about to fire off a text on her iPhone...
The guy's saying "Right, I'm going to stick his burnt sienna where the sun don't shine"
-
3
-
-
Pity the pictures don't expand - it will be really nice to see those bigger as it looks a real beaut.
-
1
-
-
HOW MANY PSYCHIATRISTS DOES IT TAKE TO CHANGE A LIGHTBULB?
Only 1, but the lightbulb has to really want to change..
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, Sword said:Rees-Mogg handed in a hand written resignation letter dated ‘St Crispin’s Day’ and requested that the new PM to "convey my resignation as secretary for business, energy and industrial strategy to the King".
Isn't it rather poor that his handwriting is barely legible and that it wasn't sealed and written on a parchment.
They don't call him the "Victorian pencil" for nothing! Thank gawd he's gone, though I'd prefer even him to Cruella Braverperson.
-
13 hours ago, Iannich48 said:I guess that there are a few members on here that did buy coins in 1969. I was born in 1969, so that is a few years before i bought any.
I bought a 1919KN from a schoolmate. My first dealer purchase was a silver 3d (GV) dated perhaps 1933? which was at least EF and cost me around 6d of my 1968 pocket money!
-
1
-
-
A year later, the 1970 Coins and Medals Annual (later to morph into the Coins Market Values annual) listed some interesting prices, including the following two:
- 1932 penny BU ..................... £50 (probably around £500 at today's RPI?)
- 1797 twopence BU .............. £35
The 1932 penny has probably doubled in price, i.e. a long way behind inflation, whereas a genuine BU 1797 would probably fetch £1000 in that grade.
-
23 hours ago, 1949threepence said:Supposing the price doesn't come down, what then? Hard luck folks, suck it up?
Precisely NO-ONE has said that. Everyone apart from Truss has talked about regularly reviewing the situation.
-
6 hours ago, 1949threepence said:3/ Why is it unrealistic? Absolutely no-one in politics or the media (that I recall) said it was unrealistic at the time it was announced, NOBODY bar none - so why is it suddenly and miraculously unrealistic now? Expensive yes, but unrealistic no. In fact it's a disgrace to just scrap a public commitment on an extremely serious issue, simply because you have a different philosophy.
It's nothing to do with philosophy - if in the event fuel costs go back to what they were within a year, then the 2 year promise is indeed unrealistic. Ok, it might not - probably won't - happen but a review every 6 months would certainly keep an eye on what's needed.
-
That's fascinating - I have a farthing of the same date with exactly the same effect (even more dramatic?):
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, 1949threepence said:We already know that it's not an absolute cap in terms of individual usage, which may be more or less. But it is the accepted phrase used to describe the overall cost to consumers, unless you can think of a better one.
Well, only "The £2,500 figure is the new cost to consumers currently paying £1,200. (Some pay more, others less, depending on actual usage)."
The energy price cap, which I believe is set by Ofgem, limits the maximum amount energy suppliers can charge you for each unit of energy used.
As for April 2023, the two year promise helped worried households to feel a bit more secure
They'd have felt no less secure if the government had said "It's help for 6 months, and then we'll review it every 6 months for up to 2 years to see how the situation changes."
, and could have been modified to take account of overall energy price changes along the way. Now they've had the rug pulled from under their feet again.
Only because the government made a fatuous unrealistic promise (probably for purely political reasons).
Wit regard to helping the most vulnerable, I can forecast quite accurately now, that will be an administrative nightmare as there will be millions right on whatever borderline is set, who will be disputing the decision in their case.
Sadly you're right, I think.
-
On 10/17/2022 at 3:58 PM, 1949threepence said:We'll hear what Hunt has to say soon, but the one decent thing that was announced before Kwarteng's mini budget, namely a 2 year energy price cap set at £2,500, now only lasts for 6 months, until April 2023, with (as yet undefined) help for the vulnerable.
Absolutely bloody spiffing.
Bl00dy reporters have a lot to answer for. That widely quoted £2,500 figure isn't the price cap, which is actually applied to the price per unit. The figure is just an average - some people will use more and have higher bills, others less.
As for April 2023 - it makes sense to review the whole situation then, as the cost of fuel may have sharply decreased by then. A two-year promise of help was always barmy.
-
On 10/17/2022 at 2:41 PM, Iannich48 said:£1100, more than I would have thought.
I think you've put a comma in there by mistake...
-
2
-
1
-
-
-
Doctor: "Who's the Prime Minister?"
Patient: "Er.. um.. er.."
Doctor: "Who's the Chancellor?"
Patient: "Er.. um.. er.."
Doctor: "Who's the Home Secretary?"
Patient: "Er.. um.. er.."
Doctor: "Ok, you've passed - you don't have Alzheimers"
-
2
-
1
-
-
You mean the subject of that open letter?
-
22 hours ago, 1949threepence said:Is it a couple of hours, Chris?
As you say it is a short window, but actually much longer than some forums.
I'm not sure? I believe it was once as short as 20 minutes but longer now.
Stuff to Make Us Laugh
in Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!
Posted
Meanwhile I withdraw from Kherson but leave the announcement to my generals so they don't associate this colossal failure (sorry, "strategic realignment") with me.